View Full Version : Twist on my project
RUSH2112
12-29-2006, 10:38 AM
Well I have been thinking about my project some more and here is something different I have come up with. I was thinking about getting this motor:
http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?part=FMS%2DM%2D6007%2DS58&N=700+4294918831+4294908331+115&autoview=sku
If I get this motor, will my headers, intake and whatever else I currently have complete this crate engine to be dropped in my car? Tell me what I need to make this motor complete and ready to drop in my car.
After I got the crate motor in, I would strip down my current motor down to the block and get it prepped and ready for a stroker build. This may take me a good year to get the money for the stroker build, but at least I’ll have a brand new 351W in the car to use while my 302 is getting stroked.
What do you think?
Viper_ed
12-29-2006, 10:56 AM
If you're going to build a stroker, why buy a new longblock to put in the car. Just find a used engine to stick in there for the mean time. :twocents:
87notch
12-29-2006, 11:02 AM
Current set up wont fit and why spend 2700 plus on something that does not help you achieve your end goal.Take that money and buy a 351 block and stroke it and build a big inch motor,or just buy a 302 core to stroke if thats what you want and run yours the way it is until its complete just my opinion.
RUSH2112
12-29-2006, 11:15 AM
Thanks guys. Here is my situation. My current motor (that has 145K miles) is burning oil and now using ALOT of coolant. I was trying to think of an easy way to drop a 'complete' motor in then take the time to build up my current motor. I can't even be sure that my current block is good to be stroked
So what do you suggest to do for $2700? (and NO, not give it anyone :veryhappy: )
There is a strong possiblity of getting the $$$ at tax time, but also keep in mind that the project would need to be done by mid-May
INSANELY CRAZY
12-29-2006, 11:53 AM
i think thats a waste to spend all that now just to spend more later then take it out to install your stroker.. you should find a complete used/running 5.0,drop in while u build your stroker...or build that one and put up with ur oil/coolant issues for a little longer.. a couple 100 now, then you'll have more $ to spend on ur stroker motor... just my .02
mlowry1260
12-29-2006, 01:13 PM
Unless your goals have changed, I'd do a 347 given your investment in parts to date. You said you wanted a fun street/show car right. If you were more intersted in racing I'd say do a 351w stroker 408 or bigger. A 347 will add gobs of torque to that heavy 'vert. Get a set of afr 185's, a decent intake like a edelbrock rpm II or the RPM clone. Built right a 347 will give you many fun miles.
RUSH2112
12-29-2006, 01:26 PM
Unless your goals have changed, I'd do a 347 given your investment in parts to date. You said you wanted a fun street/show car right. If you were more intersted in racing I'd say do a 351w stroker 408 or bigger. A 347 will add gobs of torque to that heavy 'vert. Get a set of afr 185's, a decent intake like a edelbrock rpm II or the RPM clone. Built right a 347 will give you many fun miles.
thanks Mark. Yeah it will not be raced and will strictly be a street beast/car show queen eventually.
So maybe I should just run my current motor for another year, pickup a short or longblock and started piecing it together. I think I should go with a 331 instead of a 347. Either one stroked will kick me in my butt when I get on it :laughing1:
Viper_ed
12-29-2006, 01:59 PM
FYI, a 347 is cheaper to build if you're still trying to stick to a tight budget.
RUSH2112
12-29-2006, 02:19 PM
Thanks for the info. I have heard too many 'bad' things about the 347, but I am on a tight budget.. HMMM decisions decisions
Viper_ed
12-29-2006, 02:35 PM
I have heard too many 'bad' things about the 347, but I am on a tight budget.. HMMM decisions decisions
There is NOTHING WRONG with a 347! :no:
mlowry1260
12-29-2006, 03:28 PM
There is NOTHING WRONG with a 347! :no:
If you're concerned with the oil ring/piston pin thing, go with the CHP/Probe piston & 5.315" rod setup. The 347 has gotten a bad rep on places like the corral & the advertising weenies at DSS & CHP. If a 347 is machined & clearances correctly it won't be an oil burner. But, that's true of any most any motor. Don't believe everything you read on the Internet & in the car magazines. People don't often disclose their agenda especially on the 'net. What I have is best syndrome runs wild on places like corral.net. I have a 331 & regret not doing a 347 for the extra cubes & torque. If you were doing a high boost or large N2O shot then, I'd might go with a 3.25" stroke. But then again, they are plenty of wickedly fast blown/turbo/N2O cars running 347's in various race series.
GOT SVT
12-30-2006, 01:58 AM
http://www.pittspeed.com/forums/showthread.php?t=30391
cheap engine
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.