1994 5.0

[hunter31]

How does the 94 5.0 run with a auto and shift kit I am looking at this car now
sale-994777620@craigslist.org (sale-994777620@craigslist.org?subject=1994%20Mustang%20 Gt%20Red%20Aode%20Very%20Clean%20in%20and%20out%21 %20-%20$4000%20%28pittsburgh%29) I have come to the conclusion the 89 is way over priced it needs a back bumper due to crack in it, paint job, steering wheel needs fixed and needs inspected for 3000 seems like alot to me.
Thanks Hunter

[94svtcobra]

I have a 94 5.0 doesnt have the auto, but I love it, fun car n quick

[955.0]

How does the 94 5.0 run with a auto and shift kit I am looking at this car now
sale-994777620@craigslist.org I have come to the conclusion the 89 is way over priced it needs a back bumper due to crack in it, paint job, steering wheel needs fixed and needs inspected for 3000 seems like alot to me.
Thanks Hunter
I love my SN95 lots of Fun!!

[Rio94gt]

My 94' Auto went 10.60 :)

The shift kit will definately help the auto out. Throw some gears in there and itll wake up alot if it still has stock gears.

[Killercanary]

Stock AODE cars are for the most part pigs. Throw in a converter, gears, and a shift kit and it'll really wake it up though. If its all stock I wouldn't be surprised if it ran high 15's at 89mph, 'verts can even rise into the 16 second range if all stock. BUT, the parts I listed can drop almost a second from your ET's.

[Viper_ed]

Here's the closest thing I can compare one to:

:deadhorse:

[hunter31]

well said Ed I am going to keep looking I have my heart set on a Fox body
Hunter

[Viper_ed]

well said Ed I am going to keep looking I have my heart set on a Fox body
Hunter

Still got a real nice one I'm going to unload if you're interested.

[Pure Stock]

Put a three pedal deal in it and you'll be in the 14's if you can drive the s.o.b.

[Pure Stock]

Here's the closest thing I can compare one to:

:deadhorse:

Is it worse than a 96-97 2v 4.6 slushbox?

[INSANELY CRAZY]

Is it worse than a 96-97 2v 4.6 slushbox?


ima say no... i've owned both 94 gt auto and 96 gt stick. and the 94 auto was way faster in my opinion.

my 94 auto was pretty much stock,i didnt think it was too bad,but tryin to compare a 94+ stang to foxbodys cant happen. if you got your mind set on a fox then just hold out till you find one in your range and condition.

my statment above is comparing stock to stock and is only my .02
:goodidea:

[Pure Stock]

ima say no... i've owned both 94 gt auto and 96 gt stick. and the 94 auto was way faster in my opinion.:goodidea:

Have you ever seen a bone stock 94-95 auto run mid 14's in the 1/4?

[INSANELY CRAZY]

Have you ever seen a bone stock 94-95 auto run mid 14's in the 1/4?

not really, when i had the 94 i wasent into track times and all and i never took my 96 to the track. 94+ stock stang are why i got into foxbodys.then i bought my 97 trans am(rip) which ran mid 13's stock.

[Pure Stock]

not really, when i had the 94 i wasent into track times and all and i never took my 96 to the track. 94+ stock stang are why i got into foxbodys. then i bought my 97 trans am(rip) which ran mid 13's stock.

I had the chance, way back, to do some testing with a first gen 4.6 5-speed manual trans. This one had pwr. windows/locks, Mach 460, cloth interior, 3.27's and the 17" wheels with 245/45/17. Completely show room stock, stock Good Year Eagles, air silencer in intake tract, full weight (e.g., spare tire, jack front sway bar) Tested at Keystone Raceway (back then) it went a 14.647@ 92 and some change. Some modifications were then introduced to the 215 H.P. mill. A K&N filter, off road 2 1/2" h-pipe, u.d. pulleys, Flowmater 2-chamber cat-back, and 3.73's were added. In somewhat similar conditions ( i know that's vague):) Only 3 hundreths was lost and the mph increased by about 2/3's of 1 mph. In my example, the 4.6 did not respond well with the more free flowing exhaust and intake tract as well as the torque multiplication. Both tests had almost identical sixty foot times.

I have not tested a 94-95 auto 5-Liter, but have tested a manual trans. 94 coupe. The fox body remained the quickest/fastest until the 95 Cobra R hit the scene with the factory 351W. IMO.


Although, I always wanted to see what a 87-88 manual trans speed density coupe with 3.08's would do against a 93 5.0L Cobra.... ya know, stock to stock/same driver....

[INSANELY CRAZY]

I had the chance, way back, to do some testing with a first gen 4.6 5-speed manual trans. This one had pwr. windows/locks, Mach 460, cloth interior, 3.27's and the 17" wheels with 245/45/17. Completely show room stock, stock Good Year Eagles, air silencer in intake tract, full weight (e.g., spare tire, jack front sway bar) Tested at Keystone Raceway (back then) it went a 14.647@ 92 and some change. Some modifications were then introduced to the 215 H.P. mill. A K&N filter, off road 2 1/2" h-pipe, u.d. pulleys, Flowmater 2-chamber cat-back, and 3.73's were added. In somewhat similar conditions ( i know that's vague):) Only 3 hundreths was lost and the mph increased by about 2/3's of 1 mph. In my example, the 4.6 did not respond well with the more free flowing exhaust and intake tract as well as the torque multiplication. Both tests had almost identical sixty foot times.

I have not tested a 94-95 auto 5-Liter, but have tested a manual trans. 94 coupe. The fox body remained the quickest/fastest until the 95 Cobra R hit the scene with the factory 351W. IMO.


Although, I always wanted to see what a 87-88 manual trans speed density coupe with 3.08's would do against a 93 5.0L Cobra.... ya know, stock to stock/same driver....

not sure what the times on a 93 cobra are, but shaun (lib88stang on here) his coupe (88 full weight,stock 200k mile motor) went 13.6/13.7 at prp awhile back. his car runs pretty good.

[2001GTTT]

I dont know why everyone hates on the auto, most of the fastest cars out there are auto, (with the exception of purestock, lol).

They are consistent, you never miss a gear, and you never gotta buy a clutch. : )

Im not hating on the stick cars at all, just saying..

[03 OW SVT]

I dont know why everyone hates on the auto, most of the fastest cars out there are auto, (with the exception of purestock, lol).

They are consistent, you never miss a gear, and you never gotta buy a clutch. : )

Im not hating on the stick cars at all, just saying..

Sticks are just more fun to drive Clark. I'm not hating the auto's I just prefer sticks in Muscle cars.:thmbsup::highfive:

[crazylou]

How does the 94 5.0 run with a auto and shift kit I am looking at this car now
sale-994777620@craigslist.org I have come to the conclusion the 89 is way over priced it needs a back bumper due to crack in it, paint job, steering wheel needs fixed and needs inspected for 3000 seems like alot to me.
Thanks Hunter


fix the crack,u dont need a new bumper,paint it,and do 60 dollar inspection on it,and tighten the bolt under the dash on the colum, listen ur not gona get it for nothing ya kno i always say u want it buy it....:goodidea: tell him u'll meet hin in the middle 2750...

[hunter31]

I think I am going to just give him the 3000 for it They seem to be hard to find in that price range
Hunter

[Rio94gt]

What bumper does it need? I have a rear bumper in mint condition that would just need painted for you.

[hunter31]

It has a GT bumper 1989

[Killercanary]

Yeahloh on here has a fox he may part with for around that price and its in pretty good shape. You may want to contact him about it.

[Rio94gt]

It has a GT bumper 1989
Oops. Thought you were talking about the 94.

[John4cam]

I think I am going to just give him the 3000 for it They seem to be hard to find in that price range
Hunter


One other thing to remember is it has some good starting mods on it as well, the 89......

[ModularMike]

I dont know why everyone hates on the auto, most of the fastest cars out there are auto, (with the exception of purestock, lol).

They are consistent, you never miss a gear, and you never gotta buy a clutch. : )

Im not hating on the stick cars at all, just saying..

:ghey::ghey:

Haha just kidding. Just a stock auto is usually slower than a stock 5sp.

[2001GTTT]

:ghey::ghey:

Haha just kidding. Just a stock auto is usually slower than a stock 5sp.


with the right driver.