PDA

View Full Version : The debut of the SN-95 on Motorweek



Pure Stock
09-19-2009, 03:18 AM
Base price 1994 GT coupe = $17,280 compared to the base price of a 2010 GT coupe $28,495. $11,215 difference. 100 fwhp for just a smidgen over 11 grand. What a deal!!
YouTube- MW 1994 Ford Mustang Preview

AdamantiumSilvr
09-19-2009, 03:33 AM
Two things about'em thats pretty crazy that I got from that is: 1 the interior from 94' to 04' pretty much look almost the same n 2 the V6 vert is like 20grand!

yeahloh95
09-19-2009, 08:32 AM
wow i have a new fav video , next to how to power shift

MBH
09-19-2009, 09:41 AM
11 grand sounds like a ton, but you should really take inflation into account..

In 1993's dollar value, $17400 would be the equivalent of $25989.70 in 2009. So the real difference is only $2,505.30

I think for $2500, you get a hell of a lot more car, a lot more features, a lot better quality and a lot more safety. Just my .02 though.

White5.0
09-19-2009, 10:43 AM
11 grand sounds like a ton, but you should really take inflation into account..

In 1993's dollar value, $17400 would be the equivalent of $25989.70 in 2009. So the real difference is only $2,505.30

I think for $2500, you get a hell of a lot more car, a lot more features, a lot better quality and a lot more safety. Just my .02 though.

good point Bo i agree with ya on this:thumbsup:

Edit: just watched the whole video..whoa, mini disc player? i have NEVER seen a mustang with that option and didnt even know they had it? that'd be neat to have

jaa55
09-19-2009, 12:56 PM
yeah is seems a dollar doesnt go very far anymore, i get excited when the juice is on sale at walmart for $1

PaceFever79
10-06-2009, 11:35 AM
The problem with comparing so called "inflation" dollars is that back before globalization really kicked in,
there were a lot more working class folks that could afford a Mustang. Today, well, there ain't much of a
working class left, and most people that can afford a new 30k Mustang are either kids living at home, or
upper middle class professionals. The point being that for the average working class guy, a Mustang was
far more affordable in the 80s and 90s than it is today. Example; In 1988 I worked as a service writer at
a Ford dealer, my salary was about $28k and I bought a brand new 1988 LX 5.0 for $11,000, or less than
half of my yearly income. I was able to put enough cash down that my loan was only $150 per month for
24 months! Try pulling off something like that on today's working class salary to expense ratio? The real
problem isn't that Mustangs are too expensive, it's that working class salaries have fallen off a cliff. And
gone are the days when a Mustang was truly a working man's hot rod. They don't even make an attempt
anymore to market a stripped LX V8 model, which does irk me.

cwh19
10-06-2009, 01:27 PM
Very cool video

SAC81
10-06-2009, 03:52 PM
1994-1995 GTs are some kick ass cars. Good old 5.0 power in a more modern package. Cool video, makes me miss mine.