View Full Version : 2015 Mustang GT 805 RWHP 618 RWTQ
burntire
03-16-2015, 07:57 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSEkBz50IlA&feature=youtu.be
no1sirbutler
03-16-2015, 08:01 PM
Ken B is the man with tuning
Dan B.
03-16-2015, 08:45 PM
Love that color.
Mark Aubele
03-16-2015, 08:47 PM
The wraps are getting so played out.
PaxtonShelby
03-16-2015, 08:54 PM
One sick car.
sutyak
03-16-2015, 09:35 PM
That got really loud really fast. :laughing:
Awesome power with so little effort. Is there anything special about the 2015 5.0 motor vs. the 20101-2014? Factory forged internals, right? Is that all?
Cast heads that came from the boss 302 cnc program. 13mm cams. Stronger valve train. Forged bottom end.
RUTHLESS
03-17-2015, 08:47 AM
I can't be the only one on here that isn't impressed with that Tq number. I mean this isn't a supra board is it? I would expect to see Tq numbers in the 750 range with a better setup.
John4cam
03-17-2015, 09:04 AM
I can't be the only one on here that isn't impressed with that Tq number. I mean this isn't a supra board is it? I would expect to see Tq numbers in the 750 range with a better setup.
I was wondering the same thing.
u1arunit
03-17-2015, 10:28 AM
Nice HP number. Low torque. Color is terrible IMHO. Hate wraps too. Ok I'm done.
Stangman701
03-17-2015, 10:30 AM
I can't be the only one on here that isn't impressed with that Tq number. I mean this isn't a supra board is it? I would expect to see Tq numbers in the 750 range with a better setup.
It seemed a little low to me as well(at least for how high the HP number is). Might help with traction on the street though. I'd like to see what it does on E85. I'm betting it's mostly low because they can't put much timing in it with the high compression motor. Should be much better if they ever tune it on corn juice.
ERR0RMACR0
03-17-2015, 10:34 AM
That's a lot of power! Tq number does seem a little low for how much HP it's making. Is it stock otherwise? (engine and trans) Maybe they keep the tq down to let other components live.
That's a lot of power! Tq number does seem a little low for how much HP it's making. Is it stock otherwise? (engine and trans) Maybe they keep the tq down to let other components live.
It has a McLeod RXT clutch and a single piece carbon fiber drive shaft. Engine is 100% stock internally. It does have ARH Long tube headers.
RUTHLESS
03-17-2015, 03:11 PM
Looks like the vid was with VP MS109. Looks like turbos still hold a clear advantage.
That's a lot of power! Tq number does seem a little low for how much HP it's making. Is it stock otherwise? (engine and trans) Maybe they keep the tq down to let other components live.
tons of tuning parameters in the new Tri core pcm are not unlocked yet.
no1sirbutler
03-17-2015, 05:03 PM
This dyno was on race fuel like Ruthless mentioned. It was also tuned with hptuners. Supposedly they have it fully unlocked now
phillysrt4
03-17-2015, 05:05 PM
Looks like the vid was with VP MS109. Looks like turbos still hold a clear advantage.
With twins over 900 (I posted a thread a while back) I'd say so
This dyno was on race fuel like Ruthless mentioned. It was also tuned with hptuners. Supposedly they have it fully unlocked now
No they do not have it fully unlocked. I'm looking at my cars file in hptuners now.
Where hpt is much better than SCT it is not fully unlocked yet.
No pcm is ever really fully defined. There's a lot of useless features in them that never need modified.
http://tapatalk.imageshack.com/v2/15/03/18/b494e1e16ec6d6199751caec153e5c37.jpg
http://tapatalk.imageshack.com/v2/15/03/18/fd132a5f5b99769dd5fd9eeff4259520.jpg
Taken from another forum
phillysrt4
03-18-2015, 04:05 PM
With all these changes I wonder how much Ford Engineers left on the table. With the new heads and tubular manifolds my guess is not too much.
phillysrt4
03-18-2015, 04:08 PM
I can't be the only one on here that isn't impressed with that Tq number. I mean this isn't a supra board is it? I would expect to see Tq numbers in the 750 range with a better setup.
No, its a civic board ;)
Seriously though... I dunno... a lower torque number tells me that whatever torque it is making its holding to redline instead of the rate of dropoff being slower than the rate the RPMs increase.
RUTHLESS
03-18-2015, 04:27 PM
No, its a civic board ;)
Seriously though... I dunno... a lower torque number tells me that whatever torque it is making its holding to redline instead of the rate of dropoff being slower than the rate the RPMs increase.
Not sure what that means. I was looking at my dyno sheet and the HP takes over where the TQ levels off at 5k rpm. 760rwtq at 5k is no joke but I turned it up a few clicks more after the dyno tuning. lol
phillysrt4
03-18-2015, 04:34 PM
You know how some dyno graphs have a torque drop off in the very high part of the RPM band? Because of the way HP is calculated even though there is a drop off, the RPMs above 5250 are high enough that you hit a great HP number. With a "low" peak torque number it tells me there isn't a huge dropoff. That's the kind of powerband I like where you feel the strong torque to redline.
EDIT - that's why even though the torque number is "low" it tells me you have a powerband I would like... nice and "linear"
You turned it up?! yesss... MOAR TORQUE! :) :) :)
With all these changes I wonder how much Ford Engineers left on the table. With the new heads and tubular manifolds my guess is not too much.
With long tube headers and a CAI, many tuners have already made about 450rwhp NA in these cars. Usually reving them to 8000 rpm.
phillysrt4
03-18-2015, 07:33 PM
absolutely incredible! Tempting not to turbo my car and get a 15 or 16
PaxtonShelby
03-18-2015, 08:29 PM
Those must be some amazing cast pistons in the '15 to survive with that much power.
phillysrt4
03-18-2015, 08:42 PM
a credit to the tuners, thats for sure!
JeffreyCole
03-19-2015, 09:08 AM
a credit to the tuners, thats for sure!
I would imagine this is why that torque number is pretty low. To save the internals of the engine.
John4cam
03-19-2015, 09:14 AM
Those must be some amazing cast pistons in the '15 to survive with that much power.
Time will tell I guess. Could be a ticking time bomb.
The rods were the weak part of the coyote. The piston never was. Now they made the rod stronger. The piston isn't really an issue unless you plan on detonating a lot.
burntire
03-21-2015, 12:56 AM
Those must be some amazing cast pistons in the '15 to survive with that much power.
Warm weather is near. There will be 2015 carnage data soon.
The number 8 issue was tuning mishaps. Kind of odd now that coyote tuning has been figured out you don't see the number 8 issue anymore.
phillysrt4
03-21-2015, 08:32 AM
I figured out coyote tuning before they even came out:
Don't turn off the knock senseor.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.