PDA

View Full Version : Lethal Performance 2015 Mustang: 10s with a 2.9L Whipple Supercharger!


burntire
04-10-2015, 01:46 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFWKNDwbDaE
Seer
04-10-2015, 01:52 AM
They have since went 10.3. I'm also told this was not done on their 805rwhp calibration, but on a lesser pump gas friendly calibration.
burntire
04-10-2015, 02:26 AM
They have since went 10.3. I'm also told this was not done on their 805rwhp calibration, but on a lesser pump gas friendly calibration. Yea I saw that video also. Would be an easy 9 second car with an auto.
Seer
04-10-2015, 02:26 AM
Yea I saw that video also. Would be an easy 9 second car with an auto.

I think I'll be close to them in hp but the centri is a much more forgiving blower to launch.
burntire
04-10-2015, 02:27 AM
I think I'll be close to them in hp but the centri is a much more forgiving blower to launch. When I get a new one my plan is turbo / auto.
Seer
04-10-2015, 02:28 AM
When I get a new one my plan is turbo / auto.

Good luck with that. Tuning is still a mess on these 2015's. Basically none of the speed density parameters are available yet.
burntire
04-10-2015, 02:30 AM
Good luck with that. Tuning is still a mess on these 2015's.
Tuning will get sorted out over time.
Seer
04-10-2015, 02:30 AM
Tuning will get sorted out over time.

Next few weeks at least with hptuners it should get a whole lot better.
burntire
04-10-2015, 02:32 AM
Next few weeks at least with hptuners it should get a whole lot better.
Guys will get it unlocked / figured out. Then I will add the processor code to my PRP.
John4cam
04-10-2015, 08:37 AM
Strange how these cars seem to have low torque numbers. Looking at 800+rwhp you would expect EASY 9 second passes, but I wonder if the torque has something to do with that?
PaxtonShelby
04-10-2015, 08:46 AM
600+ is still a lot of torque though. That car would be a real hoot to drive.
John4cam
04-10-2015, 08:51 AM
600+ is still a lot of torque though. That car would be a real hoot to drive.

Oh no doubt. Just seems like it should be closer to mid 700's give or take.
RUTHLESS
04-10-2015, 09:20 AM
Have you guys seen these cars in person?
Dan B.
04-10-2015, 10:00 AM
That color gives me wood........
Stangman701
04-10-2015, 11:05 AM
I think the "low" torque is because of the high compression the stock motors run. Because it's a twin screw the torque still comes in right off idle, but they can't put much timing into it right away because of the higher compression. I bet the same motor running 9:1 or so would be able to make an extra 100-150 ft/lbs.
John4cam
04-10-2015, 11:29 AM
I think the "low" torque is because of the high compression the stock motors run. Because it's a twin screw the torque still comes in right off idle, but they can't put much timing into it right away because of the higher compression. I bet the same motor running 9:1 or so would be able to make an extra 100-150 ft/lbs.


That makes sense.
PaxtonShelby
04-10-2015, 11:37 AM
That color gives me wood........

Me too. Except lose that ugly graphic...

Dan - plastidip the 5.0 Ranger that color!