Pure Stock
01-18-2008, 06:25 PM
These two examples of the Mustang seem to be very similar in performance when discussing quarter mile elapsed times. The three-valve 4.6L and the four-valve 4.6L have comparable peak RWHP numbers and curb weights. In a test back in 2004 a *showroom* stock 2004 Mach 1 was tested. Data is shown below.
Weight with driver: 3,660 lbs.
RWHP: 283
RWTQ: 311
ET: 13.156@105.35 (2.03 60')
Best MPH: 105.98
Note: The Mach 1 4.6L engine is NOT the 1996-1998 Cobra engine. And it is not a detuned version of the 1999-2001 Cobra engine. It has a different block(though made of aluminum), different heads and different cams.
The factory h.p. and torque ratings from Ford are 310@6,000 and 335@4,200. Coupled with 3.55's from the gate, IMO, high 12's are within reach with a better 60'. :pinkthumb:
Weight with driver: 3,660 lbs.
RWHP: 283
RWTQ: 311
ET: 13.156@105.35 (2.03 60')
Best MPH: 105.98
Note: The Mach 1 4.6L engine is NOT the 1996-1998 Cobra engine. And it is not a detuned version of the 1999-2001 Cobra engine. It has a different block(though made of aluminum), different heads and different cams.
The factory h.p. and torque ratings from Ford are 310@6,000 and 335@4,200. Coupled with 3.55's from the gate, IMO, high 12's are within reach with a better 60'. :pinkthumb: