How does the 94 5.0 run with a auto and shift kit I am looking at this car now
sale-994777620@craigslist.org I have come to the conclusion the 89 is way over priced it needs a back bumper due to crack in it, paint job, steering wheel needs fixed and needs inspected for 3000 seems like alot to me.
Thanks Hunter
I have a 94 5.0 doesnt have the auto, but I love it, fun car n quick
I love my SN95 lots of Fun!!Originally Posted by hunter31
My 94' Auto went 10.60 :)
The shift kit will definately help the auto out. Throw some gears in there and itll wake up alot if it still has stock gears.
2013 Race Red F-150 Screw FX4 Ecoboost
1994 Rio Red GT
10.60 @122.88
Sold
Stock AODE cars are for the most part pigs. Throw in a converter, gears, and a shift kit and it'll really wake it up though. If its all stock I wouldn't be surprised if it ran high 15's at 89mph, 'verts can even rise into the 16 second range if all stock. BUT, the parts I listed can drop almost a second from your ET's.
-Paul
1995 GT 'vert
Best times on old 302 combo:
12.03 at 112.5mph NA
Best time with 9:1 compression NA dart block 331 setup:
11.50 at 121mph
Dyno'd: 415rwhp/410rwtq
2004 Z16 commemorative edition Z06
100% stock: 11.9 at 118mph
Here's the closest thing I can compare one to:
well said Ed I am going to keep looking I have my heart set on a Fox body
Hunter
Still got a real nice one I'm going to unload if you're interested.
Put a three pedal deal in it and you'll be in the 14's if you can drive the s.o.b.
2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :
BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
Is it worse than a 96-97 2v 4.6 slushbox?Here's the closest thing I can compare one to:
2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :
BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
ima say no... i've owned both 94 gt auto and 96 gt stick. and the 94 auto was way faster in my opinion.
my 94 auto was pretty much stock,i didnt think it was too bad,but tryin to compare a 94+ stang to foxbodys cant happen. if you got your mind set on a fox then just hold out till you find one in your range and condition.
my statment above is comparing stock to stock and is only my .02
ridin fast,hittin da hills,throwin some dirt
2003 polaris predator 500
(wanna ride,just pm me!!!)
Have you ever seen a bone stock 94-95 auto run mid 14's in the 1/4?ima say no... i've owned both 94 gt auto and 96 gt stick. and the 94 auto was way faster in my opinion.
2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :
BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
not really, when i had the 94 i wasent into track times and all and i never took my 96 to the track. 94+ stock stang are why i got into foxbodys.then i bought my 97 trans am(rip) which ran mid 13's stock.
Last edited by INSANELY CRAZY; 01-17-2009 at 09:21 PM.
ridin fast,hittin da hills,throwin some dirt
2003 polaris predator 500
(wanna ride,just pm me!!!)
I had the chance, way back, to do some testing with a first gen 4.6 5-speed manual trans. This one had pwr. windows/locks, Mach 460, cloth interior, 3.27's and the 17" wheels with 245/45/17. Completely show room stock, stock Good Year Eagles, air silencer in intake tract, full weight (e.g., spare tire, jack front sway bar) Tested at Keystone Raceway (back then) it went a 14.647@ 92 and some change. Some modifications were then introduced to the 215 H.P. mill. A K&N filter, off road 2 1/2" h-pipe, u.d. pulleys, Flowmater 2-chamber cat-back, and 3.73's were added. In somewhat similar conditions ( i know that's vague):) Only 3 hundreths was lost and the mph increased by about 2/3's of 1 mph. In my example, the 4.6 did not respond well with the more free flowing exhaust and intake tract as well as the torque multiplication. Both tests had almost identical sixty foot times.
I have not tested a 94-95 auto 5-Liter, but have tested a manual trans. 94 coupe. The fox body remained the quickest/fastest until the 95 Cobra R hit the scene with the factory 351W. IMO.
Although, I always wanted to see what a 87-88 manual trans speed density coupe with 3.08's would do against a 93 5.0L Cobra.... ya know, stock to stock/same driver....
Last edited by Pure Stock; 01-17-2009 at 05:55 PM.
2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :
BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
not sure what the times on a 93 cobra are, but shaun (lib88stang on here) his coupe (88 full weight,stock 200k mile motor) went 13.6/13.7 at prp awhile back. his car runs pretty good.
ridin fast,hittin da hills,throwin some dirt
2003 polaris predator 500
(wanna ride,just pm me!!!)
I dont know why everyone hates on the auto, most of the fastest cars out there are auto, (with the exception of purestock, lol).
They are consistent, you never miss a gear, and you never gotta buy a clutch. : )
Im not hating on the stick cars at all, just saying..
2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1931 Ford Model A - Project
1991 BMW 325iX
1978 Ford F150
1952 Ford F2 - Project
2001 Mustang GT - gone but never forgotten. RIP.
Sticks are just more fun to drive Clark. I'm not hating the auto's I just prefer sticks in Muscle cars.
17 Ram 1500 Big Horn Hemi
16 Comp O GT Performance Pack
03 Oxford white Cobra (Gone but not forgotten)
fix the crack,u dont need a new bumper,paint it,and do 60 dollar inspection on it,and tighten the bolt under the dash on the colum, listen ur not gona get it for nothing ya kno i always say u want it buy it....
Last edited by crazylou; 01-18-2009 at 10:40 AM. Reason: add
I think I am going to just give him the 3000 for it They seem to be hard to find in that price range
Hunter
What bumper does it need? I have a rear bumper in mint condition that would just need painted for you.
2013 Race Red F-150 Screw FX4 Ecoboost
1994 Rio Red GT
10.60 @122.88
Sold
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks