MM and FF artical

[One Sweet Day]

Did anyone read the artical in MM and FF on Blower vs. Turbo? Which do you guys personally perfer? Just wanted to hear some thoughts on the subject.

[blkp42e]

i havent gotten to reading it just yet. ive kinda skimmed it. decent looking write up

Did anyone read the artical in MM and FF on Blower vs. Turbo? Which do you guys personally perfer? Just wanted to hear some thoughts on the subject.

[Twin01cobra]

I had a blower on my car up until this year and made some decent power on 13#'s of boost 510 rwhp, now putting twin turbos on it to make big power. Looking to make 650 rwhp or so on pump gas and low boost and 800 rwhp or so on racing fuel with higher boost, so my vote will go for turbos.

[One Sweet Day]

See, so far I perfer the turbos, but I don't have alot of experience with either.

[87notch]

Turbo

[Martin0660]

Turbo for me, but it come that, and a supercharger might look a little funny hanging on a 4 cylinder

Bob Myers

[lib88stang]

Turbo for me, but it come that, and a supercharger might look a little funny hanging on a 4 cylinder

Bob Myers

I agree with Bob

[Pure Stock]

Is there any other way than N/A...;)

[blkp42e]

I went Turbo to SC due to the complexity of my setup and daily drivability

[mikeymustang]

In my opinion...

Superchargers are easy and usually cheaper to install, maintain,and tune
but will make less power than a turbo due to losses driving the belt

Turbos usually are more expensive (kit form) and are harder to install, and tune... and depending on the mount location under the hood heat can be a factor..But it will usually make more HP than a supercharger

Just my 2 cents worth

Mike

[Balaska347]

GOT RUMBLE??? N/A all the way.