Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: 3.73 vs 4.10

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Junior Member ric6180's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Somerset county
    Posts
    6

    3.73 vs 4.10

    OK I am not sure what future mods I am going to do.... as in not sure if I will go heads and cam or S/C down the road. With that being said what are the drawbacks of going with 4.10's. How much MPG do you lose and how are 4.10 at highway speeds? The car is a 5 speed if that makes a diff.
    2001 GT vert
    5 Speed
    27k miles
    mineral grey
    SSS cat back
    Polished CAI
    more to come

  2. #2
    Right Wing Nut Dragger Troll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,822
    Let me finish your debate by saying your thread should have been titled "4.10 or 4.30"

    everybody on this site that owns a SOHC 2V will tell you to go 4.10 no matter what mods... current or future.

    MPG will depend on your right foot and gear selection. There are probably guys on here getting 17mpg with 3.27s and guys getting 22mpg with 4.30s.
    2019 Colorado ZR2


  3. #3
    Junior Member ric6180's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Somerset county
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by Troll View Post
    Let me finish your debate by saying your thread should have been titled "4.10 or 4.30"

    everybody on this site that owns a SOHC 2V will tell you to go 4.10 no matter what mods... current or future.

    MPG will depend on your right foot and gear selection. There are probably guys on here getting 17mpg with 3.27s and guys getting 22mpg with 4.30s.

    OK I hear you but I have also heard a lot of people say not to go above 3.73 if you plan S/C or turbo...... why is that??
    2001 GT vert
    5 Speed
    27k miles
    mineral grey
    SSS cat back
    Polished CAI
    more to come

  4. #4
    Right Wing Nut Dragger Troll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,822
    Quote Originally Posted by ric6180 View Post
    OK I hear you but I have also heard a lot of people say not to go above 3.73 if you plan S/C or turbo...... why is that??
    there could be some validity to this. you'll burn through the gears like crazy with that much power and 4.10s. 1st gear will basically be useless. With 4.10s, you'll redline at about 25mph (1st) 50mph (2nd) 75mph (3rd) and 100-110mph (4th).
    2019 Colorado ZR2


  5. #5
    Slow Vehicles Team SonofaBish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Spencerport, NY
    Posts
    3,762
    Quote Originally Posted by ric6180 View Post
    OK I hear you but I have also heard a lot of people say not to go above 3.73 if you plan S/C or turbo...... why is that??
    well, ppl will tell you this when you go turbo because of several reasons... 1 is what troll mentioned above.... the other is that the taller gears will help spool the turbo quicker and will allow you to stay in the powerband longer....

    this really isn't the case with blown applications though......

    unless you're planning on going turbo in the future, you better just listen to these guys and get soemthing in the 4.xx range...
    2015 Corvette Z06
    - Shark Grey / Kalahari
    - bolt-ons, tune, lots of carbon fiber (642/671 rwhp/tq)

  6. #6
    Senior Member Rodeheaver's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    McClellandtown
    Posts
    3,482
    I feel that the 99+ cars wiegh enough to justify 4.10 gears with a supercharged application.. The 4.10s are my choice!
    2015 A6 Mustang GT that so far has gone 9.48@147 but still the fastest prochargerd S550 in the world aside from Tim Essick's!
    www.Rodeheavershotrod.com

  7. #7
    Senior Member Silverstang15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Latrobe
    Posts
    129
    GO 373! or better yet why not just go 390

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Polar Vortex
    Posts
    6,031
    Quote Originally Posted by Silverstang15 View Post
    GO 373! or better yet why not just go 390

    Why?

  9. #9
    Modular Ford Performance Wolfpack Speed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    4,321
    They only time we install numerically less then a 4.10 in a modular car is when the customer makes us!!!
    Wolfpack Speed, Inc.
    4290 Campbells Run Rd
    Pittsburgh, PA 15205
    (412) 279-4902

  10. #10
    Not Bad for 367 SAE RWHP Pure Stock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,499
    Quote Originally Posted by ric6180 View Post
    With that being said what are the drawbacks of going with 4.10's.
    More powershifts.
    2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :

    BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •