wat cam?

**wick** · 09-30-2009, 01:08 PM

Set of trick flow's on stangbangers for $800...

**Rodeheaver's** · 09-30-2009, 01:53 PM

Originally Posted by Killercanary

No problem with not agreeing as long as its civil right? :) Maybe I need to come down and spin the rollers to make a believer out of you. :)

haha

, mayb ewe should try it out... i like to be proven wrong, it makes me try harder yet!!

**Pure Stock** · 10-01-2009, 09:20 AM

Originally Posted by Killercanary

more area under the curve and ultimately be the faster car. Higher peak HP numbers do not mean that the car will be faster, the car with more area under the curve will even if it doesn't make as much peak power. I was running 12.1 at 111mph with 294rwhp with my AFR165 heads in my heavy 'vert which was ~3700lbs at the time.

And if I may add, the average power production will also effect the e.t./MPH package as a whole. In the example you cited above, if the trap speed is 111 flat, the ideal e.t. works out to be roughly 12.19 with that given mph. Running near, e.g.,(within a tenth to a tenth and a half) the ideal clearly indicates that the combo was generating very good avg. power. Of course, many other variables effect the e.t./MPH package including the shear 3,700 lbs. curb weight!

It is not uncommon for a well thought out combo to flat out e.t. another similiar combo e.g.,( identical displacement, gearing, vehicle weight, peak RWHP, etc.) and as Paul's example proves, in a street car at that, doing the R&D speaks volumes.