What everyone needs to remember is that the BBC version dosn't receive outside revenue from advertisers. Therefore they can say this car sucks and not worry about gm pulling commercial money. If they have potato chip companies and vaginal cream ads them they can say some of the tested cars are junk, but if they have to bow to the advertisers the show will lose a lot of what makes the british show good.
New combo going in 410w, tea225 high ports solid roller, novi2000, glens fuel system, pa
Supercomp c4, some other things, hoping to run 10's...update 10.50@120 on 8 burned pistons...hoping to run 9's no cage in sight
I'll take any car related show vs. all the other crap on tv.
You'd take Pinks over other stuff on TV?Originally Posted by Cam99
yes i would , it beats all the "reality " shows and i get to see some cars going down the track even if they screwed it all up this year now showing qualifing
Troy
95 gt 11.3 @ 126
68 f100 SB soon to be coyote powered
12 GT 6m cobra jet powered 11.4 @124
90 lx supercharged 440 rwhp on 8 lbs
17 f150 crew cab coyote powered
PEOPLE HAVE MORE FUN THAN ANYONE
The second one was better. That Evo went in the deep snow pretty good. I think my Mustang could go that good through deep snow also.
2002 Mustang GT(sold)
1993 Taurus SHO R.I.P.
2006VDUB GTI
They sent my Census form back! AGAIN!!! In response to the question: "Do you have any dependents?" I replied - "12 million illegal immigrants; 3 million crack heads; 42 million unemployable people, 2 million people in over 243 prisons; Half of Mexico; and 535 more in the U.S. House and Senate. Apparently, this was NOT an acceptable answer.
Blind guy doing the drifting with Tanner in the car was pretty good.
Rutledge (beard guy) was a speed reporter for nascar, so he's not completly car ignorant.
I think Adam needed new underwear after the speed runs in the Lambo.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks