im looking at a 95 cobra, manual car... was wondering if anyone has any input on these cars... thx
im looking at a 95 cobra, manual car... was wondering if anyone has any input on these cars... thx
ridin fast,hittin da hills,throwin some dirt
2003 polaris predator 500
(wanna ride,just pm me!!!)
SLOW ASS JUNK! Buy a FOX if you want another 5.0L car.
look for a 96-98 if you want an SN-95 cobra
2013 Mustang GT
1987 Mustang GT
1999 Contour SVT
nothing really special about them thats why you could get away with a fauxbra
ok, guess thats all i need to hear...lol....... guess ima start looking round.. ima keep this 96 for a d/d and find another 5.0
ridin fast,hittin da hills,throwin some dirt
2003 polaris predator 500
(wanna ride,just pm me!!!)
Jared might have one for sale!Originally Posted by INSANELY CRAZY
I like the body style, plus it has a 5.0, and its a cobra. I just like em.
03 Cobra=slow show car...
13 F-150 Limited
Jared might have one for sale!
Jared might have one for sale!
ridin fast,hittin da hills,throwin some dirt
2003 polaris predator 500
(wanna ride,just pm me!!!)
Real nice examples are few and far, but they are out there. The SN-95 chassis is a great platform (just a little more portly than a fox)
The stigma out there is that they are dogs. Well, A LOT to do with that is the driver's ABILITY. IMHO they are not far behind a light weight fox. With some weight reduction and the *correct* mods i.e., 10 minute tune-up they can be a formidable contender.
2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :
BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
I beg to differ. When the last time you put one through the paces at a 1/4 mile race track? Oh, I forgot, you don't do timed acceleration contests.
2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :
BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
ok, so maybe i should ask this question.. are they faster then a 4.6?
i know ed said they are slow, but compared to (like my) 4.6 whats da opinion?
ridin fast,hittin da hills,throwin some dirt
2003 polaris predator 500
(wanna ride,just pm me!!!)
No doubt, *if* the driver is on his or her game they could put one in the 13's. Full weight, radial tires, oem factory right down to the air horn.
I've flogged a 1st gen 4.6 5-speed vs. a 94 5.0L 5-speed both cars in OEM form and my results show a consistent .3-.5 sec. differential between the two. 60' times were *very similar* and shift rpm was maximized. Testing was also done in a variety of air quality conditions.
The 5.0L was the quicker/faster of the two. That was *not* a Cobra 5.0L that is rated @ 235 FWHP. Which is an under-rated figure.
2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :
BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
You have a problem with the testing procedures outlined above?
2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :
BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
They may be slower than other models, but they are SWEET!!!
87 GT
93 Notch
60 Country Sedan
Fairlanes/Galaxies 59-68
67 Contiental 4 door
06 Powerstroke
I seem to recall breaking a certain 95 Vert the last time I drove one at the track. Course it had a blower and I still bettered the owner's best E.T. with blowing the belt off at half track.I beg to differ. When the last time you put one through the paces at a 1/4 mile race track? Oh, I forgot, you don't do timed acceleration contests.
Ya,ya,ya,ya. Pay up sucka
2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :
BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
nope...just ed and rob
The 94-98 cobras are the best looking mustang IMO. I would like to have a 94-95 cobra. I would only pay about $1000-$1500 more for the cobra than the same year GT though. More than that and I would just swap the front bumper cover and the brakes and have a very similar car to start modding
2015 Charger Hellcat
2.4" upper pulley, ID1300 injectors, BAP, E85 tune, Cat Delete Pipes, One Piece Drive Shaft, Diff Brace, 305/35/20 555R's for the street and 305/45/18 MT ET Street R's for the track. 9.97@142 Best ET
85 GT
Heads and Cam plus other bolt ons
73 F250
Lifted, 35's, 460 4spd
Real name = Ray
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks