Guy at work has a 92 mustang gt 5spd. He is looking to make 400rwhp with the aid of a 100shot on a nx plate kit. Right now he is looking for different options on what h/c/i to run to achieve his goal. So post them up. I suggested the trick flow top end kit. Budget is 2500 that needs to pay for te supporting mods as well as the hci. Lets hear what ya suggest.
Ohh.....watching intently for ideas on my T-bird project!
1985 Ranger--2WD, basic bolt-ons and tires, 11.92 @ 111mph.Originally Posted by John4cam
1986 Ranger--2WD, 5.0/T5/8.8.
pick up some used AFR 185's, spend the $$ for a custom cam from FTI http://www.flowtechinduction.com/fordcams.htm or camshaft innovations http://www.camshaftinnovations.com/Camshafts.htm , and I would go with a used systemax II intake.
gonna need some bigger injectors, bigger TB, and a tune as well
Last edited by White5.0; 12-12-2011 at 06:41 PM.
2013 Mustang GT
1987 Mustang GT
1999 Contour SVT
yuck not jay allen
y only 185 go as big as u can afford..... room 2 grow in future....spend the money on heads cams are cheap...
COREY...
*04 Torch Red Cobra
1 of 164 with med.graphite inserts
Work done and Tuned by Rodeheaver's Hot Rod shop...
471hp/489tq
-------------------------------------------------------------------
*1970 chevelle ss L-S5 454, 4 spd
real deal not a clone have paperwork
Any Aluminum H-C-I will do 300 rwhp. Add the 100 shot there you go.
I would find a set of trick flow heads. stage one cam. holley systemax intake. 75 mm T-body 24#inj and meter
You would have to really screw up not to get 300rwhp.
1969 Camaro restomod/project
1967 camaro
2011 mustang procharged
93 reef blue notch blk/int
92 calypso notch blk/int
86 t-type
1972 chevelle project
Not only did I fail at building a fast mustang but I bought a yellow zo6 cause I couldn't get my little dick up.
You dont need a custom cam or a tune for 300rwhp.
1969 Camaro restomod/project
1967 camaro
2011 mustang procharged
93 reef blue notch blk/int
92 calypso notch blk/int
86 t-type
1972 chevelle project
Not only did I fail at building a fast mustang but I bought a yellow zo6 cause I couldn't get my little dick up.
For $2500 your not going to be able to build a shortblock with supporting mods. So anything more than the 185's is a waste.
1969 Camaro restomod/project
1967 camaro
2011 mustang procharged
93 reef blue notch blk/int
92 calypso notch blk/int
86 t-type
1972 chevelle project
Not only did I fail at building a fast mustang but I bought a yellow zo6 cause I couldn't get my little dick up.
he's looking for 400rwhp....a 100 shot of nitrous does not mean automatically 100 horsepower added no matter what. Also, if you want it done right and last a long time instead of assuming an ECU with software from the 80s will safely handle the mods/nitrous, then you are better off with a tune.
Sure you can slap on mods and nitrous, but you won't get the most out of it, nor will it run as long as a vehicle with a tune.
Last edited by White5.0; 12-12-2011 at 08:57 PM.
2013 Mustang GT
1987 Mustang GT
1999 Contour SVT
Why not? I've never dealt with him but have heard many good things...
ummm because its a 302 and not 351+ cubic inches
2013 Mustang GT
1987 Mustang GT
1999 Contour SVT
Your funny... Are you selling tunes. lol
I guess my cars done wrong. only went 10.0 and made 575rwhp with out a tune/chip.
1969 Camaro restomod/project
1967 camaro
2011 mustang procharged
93 reef blue notch blk/int
92 calypso notch blk/int
86 t-type
1972 chevelle project
Not only did I fail at building a fast mustang but I bought a yellow zo6 cause I couldn't get my little dick up.
hah no im not. He can reach his goal without one, but there is no denying it will make more power and be more reliable with a tune, that is all
2013 Mustang GT
1987 Mustang GT
1999 Contour SVT
probably would of made 600+ with a tune and went 9s
2013 Mustang GT
1987 Mustang GT
1999 Contour SVT
2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :
BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
How do you figure a tune will make more power?probably would of made 600+ with a tune and went 9s
The timing is 20 deg.locked... af ratio made most power @11.8. adjusted by fuel pressure regulator. Drivability yes. Wide oped throttle No.
1969 Camaro restomod/project
1967 camaro
2011 mustang procharged
93 reef blue notch blk/int
92 calypso notch blk/int
86 t-type
1972 chevelle project
Not only did I fail at building a fast mustang but I bought a yellow zo6 cause I couldn't get my little dick up.
[QUOTE=White5.0;297842]Why not? I've never dealt with him but have heard many good things...
I'm not going to say anything because he is not worth typing any more about, just google him, scam master J
[quote=TooFast98Cobra;297849]Post up... dont be scared
1969 Camaro restomod/project
1967 camaro
2011 mustang procharged
93 reef blue notch blk/int
92 calypso notch blk/int
86 t-type
1972 chevelle project
Not only did I fail at building a fast mustang but I bought a yellow zo6 cause I couldn't get my little dick up.
[quote=went12s;297851]
Post up... dont be scared
lol you know what I'm talking bout brother
As went12s mentioned pretty much any non-gt40 aluminum head, any 224@.050 duration cam, 30 lb injectors, any non gt40/p/cobra intake, and a good long tube/3" exhaust setup, add the spray and bingo 400hp. Its all 1995 tech stuff..lol. A super simple setup was my flattop, vic jr intake/ head, 248/256 .621/.632 110lsa solid roller, 351w with a 750cfm junk carb.
It made 431 to the wheels, no custom anything, just careful assembly and porting by me. It would run in the 11s all day every day
New combo going in 410w, tea225 high ports solid roller, novi2000, glens fuel system, pa
Supercomp c4, some other things, hoping to run 10's...update 10.50@120 on 8 burned pistons...hoping to run 9's no cage in sight
If you had a tune it would have made 500 and went 10s
1969 Camaro restomod/project
1967 camaro
2011 mustang procharged
93 reef blue notch blk/int
92 calypso notch blk/int
86 t-type
1972 chevelle project
Not only did I fail at building a fast mustang but I bought a yellow zo6 cause I couldn't get my little dick up.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks