Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Modding stock fox rear CA's??

  1. #1
    Senior Member Dan B.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Armagh, PA
    Posts
    4,331

    Modding stock fox rear CA's??

    I'm getting ready to work on the back end of a fox....mainly the control arms. Was going to replace them with tubular arms but the toy budget has tightened up lately so I'm going to pursue a different plan.

    New plan. Want to replace the stock rubber bushings with poly. Next, since I have a lot of steel plate laying around and pretty good with a welder I'm going to put a piece of plate on the bottom of the arms to basically box them. This along with the poly bushings should make them much more rigid and cost about nothing.

    Anyone ever tried this or does the idea sounds reasonable?
    Quote Originally Posted by John4cam View Post
    Ahh fuque
    1985 Ranger--2WD, basic bolt-ons and tires, 11.92 @ 111mph.

    1986 Ranger--2WD, 5.0/T5/8.8.

  2. #2
    Senior Member frankstang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Homestead
    Posts
    780
    If this is a street car you really don't want them rigid. They are designed to flex.
    But yeah, many people have boxed the stock control arms.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Dan B.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Armagh, PA
    Posts
    4,331
    Agressive street with maybe a little autocross mixed in.
    Quote Originally Posted by John4cam View Post
    Ahh fuque
    1985 Ranger--2WD, basic bolt-ons and tires, 11.92 @ 111mph.

    1986 Ranger--2WD, 5.0/T5/8.8.

  4. #4
    Senior Member wick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Carnegie
    Posts
    8,400
    Rob
    1 Monte SS. White.

    Banned dates
    11/27/08
    4/25/11
    3/28/12
    12/1/12
    There are more but that's all that was logged!!!

  5. #5
    Senior Member Dan B.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Armagh, PA
    Posts
    4,331
    Excellent....that was my plan. Thanks!
    Quote Originally Posted by John4cam View Post
    Ahh fuque
    1985 Ranger--2WD, basic bolt-ons and tires, 11.92 @ 111mph.

    1986 Ranger--2WD, 5.0/T5/8.8.

  6. #6

  7. #7
    Chevelle Owner Tony71502's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bell Acres
    Posts
    469
    Don't know if I'd recommend rigid control arms for auto-x... much less the 4 link setup.

    http://mustangforums.com/forum/suspe...ion-guide.html Check out the second post on there and illustrates some the damage rigid control arms can cause.
    1991 Jewel Green Ford Mustang LX ~ 5.0L / 5-Speed
    2011 Torch Red Ford Ranger ~ 2.3L / 5-Speed
    1971 White Chevrolet Chevelle Malibu w/ Blue Stripes ~ 8.2L(502) / 4-Speed

  8. #8
    Member Mark Aubele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Trafford, Pa
    Posts
    2,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan B. View Post
    Agressive street with maybe a little autocross mixed in.
    Not a good idea for autocross, although it isn't too bad as long as you keep the stock uppers. To oversimplify things a bit, for the four link suspension to articulate, there has to be flex in the bushings. When you remove that, the suspension binds, causing effective spring rate to increase with rear axle articulation, causing the snap oversteer at high levels of cornering force. Basically the harder you drive the car the looser it will get. When I ran aftermarket lowers with the stock four link (and a panhard bar= even more bind) the car would pull the rear tire off of the ground in corners at autocrosses. Going to the three link rear solved all the problems, and gave the sort of traction out of corners allowing the car to pull the front tire as seen in the avatar (also caused by having the rear spring rate too soft at the time as well). The same mods that let the car hook better at the dragstrip work against it in corners (stock four link that is, my 60' times went down after switching to the three-link, 1.82 on Kumho MX, 1.76 on Toyo RA-1s, 12.5s@109 on both tires same powertrain with 475lb coilovers, car 60' 1.70 on stock suspension on 235/60 BFG DRs, but never got below 1.9 on any sort of street tire with it, admittedly had pretty stiff spring rates).

    Having said all that, if that is the only thing you do you should be ok. Feel free to give me a call if you want to talk about it, you should still have my number.
    Last edited by Mark Aubele; 02-06-2012 at 01:38 PM.
    2014 Mustang GT Stock and for sale
    2014 M235i (wife's)
    1964 Ford F-100

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-21-2014, 01:03 PM
  2. Finally did some modding....
    By hillie16 in forum S197
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-28-2012, 08:43 PM
  3. WTB Stock Rear V8 springs
    By TooFast98Cobra in forum Ford Parts
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-04-2010, 05:14 PM
  4. Wanted: Stock V-8 rear springs
    By gmkillr in forum Ford Parts
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-25-2010, 10:25 PM
  5. Stock headers - rear control arms FOX - Free
    By coralcoupe1993 in forum Ford Vehicles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-15-2007, 11:05 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •