Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 41

Thread: my new stance - undecided

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Farmington WV
    Posts
    4,672

    my new stance - undecided

    well as you know we did the rear end almost 2 weeks ago now. we used the poly iso's and it was a BITCH to get them in there. but we finally did it and immediately i was unhappy....it sat too high. not like the C springs i usually run. so we gave it (12 days today) time to settle and its still too high. it looks to sit even higher now with the front being lowered. Timmy finished the front last night. didnt use the iso's up front due to not being able to fit them in at all. he tried for a while too.

    so now im unsure what to do. should i A) keep it as is, it will settle more...if not at least i can run a bigger tire in back. or B) remove top rear iso and try to level it out some more?

    here are some pics.

    #1 is out front of my place.
    #2 is in a more level lot
    #3 is the rear up close
    #4 is front up close
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    far from a newb!!! INSANELY CRAZY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    out in the woods
    Posts
    4,948
    try bigger tires... if you take the iso's out, it may wind up being lower again in the back
    ridin fast,hittin da hills,throwin some dirt

    2003 polaris predator 500

    (wanna ride,just pm me!!!)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Farmington WV
    Posts
    4,672
    i was only gonna take out the top iso and leave the bottom in

  4. #4
    Right Wing Nut Dragger Troll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,822
    Personally, I think it looks good. Most foxes have the back end all worn out and squatting down like there's two dead goats in the back. That has a nice rake to it. Looks old school. It should settle some more. 12 days ain't that long. Put a couple kegs in the back and drive around for a while. Hell, bring 'em to my house. I'm only about 20 miles further than Rodeheavers.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Farmington WV
    Posts
    4,672
    dude i been to rodeheavers every day this week so far....im taking a break.

  6. #6
    Senior Member wick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Carnegie
    Posts
    8,400
    Buy the adjustable lower arms. Like I did.
    Rob
    1 Monte SS. White.

    Banned dates
    11/27/08
    4/25/11
    3/28/12
    12/1/12
    There are more but that's all that was logged!!!

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Farmington WV
    Posts
    4,672
    Quote Originally Posted by wick View Post
    Buy the adjustable lower arms. Like I did.

    not wanting to put any more money into suspension right now. :(

    besides you got a fvcking STEAL! i have no good luck...remember.

  8. #8
    Senior Member wick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Carnegie
    Posts
    8,400
    Well, if you lived closer to civilization you might get better deals. HAHAH
    Rob
    1 Monte SS. White.

    Banned dates
    11/27/08
    4/25/11
    3/28/12
    12/1/12
    There are more but that's all that was logged!!!

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Farmington WV
    Posts
    4,672
    well you know that deal. :)


    so now about my stance......

  10. #10
    Banned George C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,490
    my C springs sat like that before

    now depending on where the pig tail is will determine how the car sits in rear

    if pig tail faces the driverside it will be lower, if pig tail is facing passenger side then the the car will sit higher in rear

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Farmington WV
    Posts
    4,672
    they face the driver.

  12. #12
    Banned George C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,490
    Quote Originally Posted by Jared View Post
    they face the driver.
    then you could always take off some of the coil to drop it some. no isolators = squeaks

  13. #13
    More RPM !!! Martin0660's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Greensburg, PA
    Posts
    8,058
    Quote Originally Posted by Quik View Post
    if pig tail faces the driverside it will be lower, if pig tail is facing passenger side then the the car will sit higher in rear
    Any Idea how much difference there is with this? I was going to add a spacer to my drivers side, but might play with the spring tomorrow and see what I get ;) Right now the passenger side is higher, so put that pigtail to face the drivers side (lower), then make the drivers side pigtail face the passenger side (higher)? Cant be this easy can it?

    Bob Myers

  14. #14
    More RPM !!! Martin0660's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Greensburg, PA
    Posts
    8,058
    Just to add what was said, cionsider the tires you are going to run too. This was my Capri with 225/50/16's on it:



    And with 245/50/16's.....



    I've gone back with 225's as the 245's were to big on the rear of this car with the SVO width rear axle, but have switched springs so the 225's look better, but cant go any lower to fit my 26" tall QTP's. I like how yours sits now.

    Bob Myers

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Farmington WV
    Posts
    4,672
    martin you may need this.
    http://www.steelcitystangs.com/forum...ead.php?t=2105

    mine leaned before but not with the new springs.

  16. #16
    Banned George C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,490
    Quote Originally Posted by Martin0660 View Post
    Any Idea how much difference there is with this? I was going to add a spacer to my drivers side, but might play with the spring tomorrow and see what I get ;) Right now the passenger side is higher, so put that pigtail to face the drivers side (lower), then make the drivers side pigtail face the passenger side (higher)? Cant be this easy can it?

    Bob Myers
    its that easy. for factory specs they face driverside

  17. #17
    Super Moderator u1arunit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,356
    Back is still too high IMO. If you take out the ISOs you can wrap the end loops with friction tape to ward off squeeks.
    Mark
    LeMans Blue Z06

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Farmington WV
    Posts
    4,672
    Quote Originally Posted by u1arunit View Post
    Back is still too high IMO. If you take out the ISOs you can wrap the end loops with friction tape to ward off squeeks.


    probably what ill do.....il remove top first and see how that looks.

  19. #19
    SCS Founder Sonic03snake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Mt Pleasant, PA
    Posts
    4,905
    The back looks higher than before you did the fronts, never seen that before. Did you delete both front isolators?
    Lou
    Best non ported stock pullied eaton pass
    1.50 60ft 11.160@ 125.08

    New combo,
    Ported Eaton, upper/lower
    508 Hp 548 TQ SAE on an inferior Dynojet Dyno
    1.43 60 ft. 10.55 @ 130 MPH

    WFC 8 Mod Motor Winner
    06 NMRA Martin, Mi. Mod Muscle Winner

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Farmington WV
    Posts
    4,672
    Quote Originally Posted by Sonic03snake View Post
    The back looks higher than before you did the fronts, never seen that before. Did you delete both front isolators?

    tim can answer for sure....but i think just the bottom.

    here is a pic before the fronts were done: not the best.....my dad was a little too far away
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by J-rod; 04-06-2007 at 10:19 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. pics of new stance
    By George C in forum Pictures & Videos
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 06-10-2007, 12:44 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •