Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 55

Thread: 5.0 track times

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Farmington WV
    Posts
    4,672

    5.0 track times

    ok please dont harass me...this is copied from another forum. i wasnt going to post here due to the abuse....but you all know the track and will be more helpful than other people.

    ok first off i apologize for being a 5.0 drag racing noob but i want to know a few things before i go to the track next weekend. now i have raced a few cars at the track but never a 5.0 stang. (a few v6's and a s/c 99 GT).

    i want to know if getting into the 13's is even possible or i am dreaming. i looked at www.dragtimes.com and saw several in the 13's with some similar mods. by 13's.....13.999 counts

    i will be driving my 1991 GT with the following mods
    LMM springs
    KYB shocks and struts
    B&M shift kit
    2200 stall
    MAC CAI
    FMS shorty headers

    O/R H pipe
    Flowmaster catback
    boxed upper/lower control arms
    3.73 rear gear

    car will have new FMS wires, plugs, MSD cap and rotor, and fresh oil change (if any of that matters)


  2. #2
    Going fast with class Slow01GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Mars, PA
    Posts
    1,696
    I would say that if you can get traction those 3.73's should help you break 13's. The low stall may hurt though.
    Dennis
    2006 GTO
    Gone but not forgotten

    2015 SHO
    Mostly stock

    2014 Cruze
    Living the MPG life

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,171
    id say 14's unless you can drive like a pro

  4. #4
    Banned George C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,490
    give you an idea. my tired ass notch at the time had 152k miles on the clock

    355s, K&N panel filter and H pipe and flows with bald QTPs. everything else stock and it went 13.38@101.8


    i say its possible but you need a much larger stall IMHO. i feel the car could of went more with more seat time. i only had the car a week and it didnt 60' good at all

  5. #5
    Senior Member wick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Carnegie
    Posts
    8,400
    Quote Originally Posted by Quik View Post
    give you an idea. my tired ass notch at the time had 152k miles on the clock

    355s, K&N panel filter and H pipe and flows with bald QTPs. everything else stock and it went 13.38@101.8


    i say its possible but you need a much larger stall IMHO. i feel the car could of went more with more seat time. i only had the car a week and it didnt 60' good at all

    How the hell did you do that? I know I am inexperienced. The best I could get from mine was a 14.20. Thats with shorties, or pipe, flows and a ram air. 3.73's. I need more practice for sure. I was also spinning at the start. I am hoping for 12.?? this summer. Doubt I'll get it but you never know.;)
    Rob
    1 Monte SS. White.

    Banned dates
    11/27/08
    4/25/11
    3/28/12
    12/1/12
    There are more but that's all that was logged!!!

  6. #6
    Banned George C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,490
    Quote Originally Posted by wick View Post
    How the hell did you do that? I know I am inexperienced. The best I could get from mine was a 14.20. Thats with shorties, or pipe, flows and a ram air. 3.73's. I need more practice for sure. I was also spinning at the start. I am hoping for 12.?? this summer. Doubt I'll get it but you never know.;)
    i went 13.4 @ 102.2 and spun some. spinning helped the mph some

    slip launch at 3500, no lift shifts at 4500 rpms and that was all she wrote. there was deff more in the car before

    my tired ass notch now even with a 171k miles is still slightly impressive

    those runs before was also with stock timing

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Farmington WV
    Posts
    4,672
    well that gives me huge doubts

  8. #8
    Banned George C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,490
    Quote Originally Posted by Jared View Post
    well that gives me huge doubts
    ill jsut sell you a built auto that has a 3200 stall and youll be set

  9. #9
    Senior Member wick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Carnegie
    Posts
    8,400
    Quote Originally Posted by Quik View Post
    i went 13.4 @ 102.2 and spun some. spinning helped the mph some

    slip launch at 3500, no lift shifts at 4500 rpms and that was all she wrote. there was deff more in the car before

    my tired ass notch now even with a 171k miles is still slightly impressive

    those runs before was also with stock timing

    As I say, I need a TON of practice. I was shifting at about 54-5500 launching at about 25 and dropping the clutch. It would hook some and them spin almost instantly. Grab second and they lit up. I guess that would account for my wonderful 2.41 60' HAHAHAHAHA
    Rob
    1 Monte SS. White.

    Banned dates
    11/27/08
    4/25/11
    3/28/12
    12/1/12
    There are more but that's all that was logged!!!

  10. #10
    Banned George C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,490
    Quote Originally Posted by wick View Post
    As I say, I need a TON of practice. I was shifting at about 54-5500 launching at about 25 and dropping the clutch. It would hook some and them spin almost instantly. Grab second and they lit up. I guess that would account for my wonderful 2.41 60' HAHAHAHAHA
    honestly in my experience with stock 5.0s your way past the peak power
    4800 stangs peak, you were just reving for sake of reving

    i was shifting around 4500-4800 and got those times. ppl always ask why i shifted to low, cause the car slows down if you go anyhigher

    also this car is SD and everyone knows stock for stock SD cars are faster

    i tried to dump clutch at 4k all that did was cause me to go 13.9...slipping it was best with the worn out tires i had

    when its nice again and your up and running we'll go down to area 51 and test your limits of driving against this tired ass notch...and see how youactually do shift and etc

  11. #11
    far from a newb!!! INSANELY CRAZY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    out in the woods
    Posts
    4,948
    you also have to look at the weight difference between your gt and quik's notch.... jared your car is heavier...your time will be determind by your reaction time (to the tree) 60' and how much you spin/hook...
    ridin fast,hittin da hills,throwin some dirt

    2003 polaris predator 500

    (wanna ride,just pm me!!!)

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Farmington WV
    Posts
    4,672
    yea i know im heavier...but i was hoping for 13.9

    guess i should shiit in one hand....you know the rest.

    i mean loking at some of those times and mods on www.dragtimes.com i dont think im hoping too much for a 13.9

  13. #13
    Banned George C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,490
    yea i have the stripped down version of a notch. i think at time of racing and me in it it was around 3100lbs lol

  14. #14
    Senior Member lib88stang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    LowHill
    Posts
    2,679
    My tired notch with 160,000 miles at the time went 13.8's with 308 gears launching at 5000 also slipping the clutch a bit and shifted at 4800rpms. It was also SD then. Now with a AOD mass air gt it prob go high 14's

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Farmington WV
    Posts
    4,672
    are any of you looking at the times on the links i posted?

    i mean these guys with exhaust and tires. 5 speed running upper 13's ??

  16. #16
    Not Bad for 367 SAE RWHP Pure Stock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,499
    Quote Originally Posted by INSANELY CRAZY View Post
    you also have to look at the weight difference between your gt and quik's notch.... jared your car is heavier...your time will be determind by your reaction time (to the tree) 60' and how much you spin/hook...
    The e.t. clocks do not activate until you roll through the stage lights. You could have a 10 second reaction time and it will not effect your e.t. The e.t. is effected by 60' and traction as stated.
    2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :

    BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18

  17. #17
    Not Bad for 367 SAE RWHP Pure Stock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,499
    Quote Originally Posted by Quik View Post
    give you an idea. my tired ass notch at the time had 152k miles on the clock

    355s, K&N panel filter and H pipe and flows with bald QTPs. everything else stock and it went 13.38@101.8


    i say its possible but you need a much larger stall IMHO. i feel the car could of went more with more seat time. i only had the car a week and it didnt 60' good at all
    There was easy .20's if not teens in that MPH.
    2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :

    BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18

  18. #18
    Banned George C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,490
    Quote Originally Posted by Pure Stock View Post
    There was easy .20's if not teens in that MPH.
    yea i remember

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Farmington WV
    Posts
    4,672
    http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...=10&carmake=15

    also page 27. those are high 13 and 14.0 cars

  20. #20
    Banned George C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,490
    Quote Originally Posted by Jared View Post
    http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...=10&carmake=15

    also page 27. those are high 13 and 14.0 cars
    i dont care for those lists. our track isnt those tracks

    Purestock took a 86 GT to 13.7 completely stock!!!!

Similar Threads

  1. New track times!
    By ebo 4356 in forum SN95-New Edge
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 08-30-2014, 08:17 PM
  2. 60' times vs. et
    By shockstang in forum Drag Racing
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 02-10-2010, 09:38 PM
  3. Some Diesel times
    By HidalgoGT in forum General Tech
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-29-2009, 10:16 PM
  4. any guess on my 1/4 times?
    By PunisherStang in forum The Bar
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-12-2008, 06:29 PM
  5. 1/4 times
    By Mitternacht in forum General Tech
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-02-2007, 11:10 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •