Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 53 of 53

Thread: The Z/28 is back !

  1. 03-29-2013, 03:39 PM #41
    PaceFever79
    PaceFever79 is offline
    Senior Member PaceFever79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    796
    Quote Originally Posted by speedracer View Post
    I hope you never get a job at Ford... the 3.7 V6 is almost as powerful at the 3 valve 4.6...
    Why don't you buy one then???

    Because it doesn't have that V8 rumble, it probably doesn't even get better
    gas mileage than a 4.6 in real world driving (power to weight)

    And Mustang sales are in the tank...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 03-29-2013, 04:01 PM #42
    PaceFever79
    PaceFever79 is offline
    Senior Member PaceFever79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    796
    I'm not advocating that Ford drop the V6 (or the ecoboost 4 cyl)

    It should increase the base model engine list to include the 4.6 V8 option.
    With stock suspension, and with a suspension/brake upgrade.

    More choice, not less, that was the gold formula.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 03-29-2013, 04:07 PM #43
    PaceFever79
    PaceFever79 is offline
    Senior Member PaceFever79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    796
    Meanwhile, the new Z/28 is still, fat and ugly!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 03-29-2013, 04:07 PM #44
    speedracer
    speedracer is offline
    adult daycare speedracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Somerset Co.
    Posts
    2,907
    Quote Originally Posted by PaceFever79 View Post
    Why don't you buy one then???
    I'm quite happy with my 4v 4.6
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 03-29-2013, 07:32 PM #45
    Mark Aubele
    Mark Aubele is offline
    Member Mark Aubele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Trafford, Pa
    Posts
    2,308
    Just what the Mustang needs, a V8 model with V6 performance at V8 pricing. The '10 wasn't much cheaper than the '11, not sure how a choice of less power (with no better MPG) with some rumble is going somehow drive sales.
    2014 Mustang GT Stock and for sale
    2014 M235i (wife's)
    1964 Ford F-100
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 03-30-2013, 10:33 AM #46
    Cam99
    Cam99 is offline
    Senior Member Cam99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melcroft
    Posts
    4,178
    ...just passing through...
    www.ridgelineheating.com

    F Forgestar
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 03-30-2013, 11:19 AM #47
    jasons_98gt
    jasons_98gt is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    washington pa
    Posts
    82
    still ugly as hell and its still a chevy..just sayin
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 03-31-2013, 01:30 AM #48
    Pure Stock
    Pure Stock is offline
    Not Bad for 367 SAE RWHP Pure Stock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,499
    Bring back the 4.6! The 5.0's are dogs!
    2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :

    BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 03-31-2013, 06:42 PM #49
    White5.0
    White5.0 is offline
    Senior Member White5.0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    State College, PA
    Posts
    3,552
    Quote Originally Posted by Pure Stock View Post
    Bring back the 4.6! The 5.0's are dogs!
    Lmao
    2013 Mustang GT
    1987 Mustang GT
    1999 Contour SVT
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 03-31-2013, 08:16 PM #50
    Darren
    Darren is offline
    Senior Member Darren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Moon Township, PA
    Posts
    859
    Quote Originally Posted by PaceFever79 View Post
    I'm not advocating that Ford drop the V6 (or the ecoboost 4 cyl)

    It should increase the base model engine list to include the 4.6 V8 option.
    With stock suspension, and with a suspension/brake upgrade.

    More choice, not less, that was the gold formula.
    I do get what your saying. In some ways i dont like how Mustangs usually are the cheaper V6 options. But in the same token in 1969, there were so many engine options. 200, 250, 302, 302 4B, 351, 351 4B, 390, 428. (Boss 302/429)
    So many options!
    2013 School Bus Yellow Boss 302
    -Recaros, Torsen #0054
    -Ford Boss Springs, BMR Upper/Lower Control Arms, Panhard Bar
    -LED Interior Lights, 15% Tint, Carbon Fiber this and that.
    -JLT, Lund nGauge
    2016 Ford Focus ST - Kona Blue - DD
    -ST3, Recaros, Nav, Roof etc
    -Springs, Tint, Mountune Intake


    1983 Black GT Hatch 5.0 - Sold
    2011 Sterling Gray GT - Sold
    2010 Candy Red Metallic GT - Sold
    2004 Competition Orange Mach 1 - Sold
    2000 Silver GT - Sold
    1969 Candy Apple Red Mustang Coupe - Sold
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 04-01-2013, 08:37 AM #51
    u1arunit
    u1arunit is offline
    Super Moderator u1arunit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,356
    Oh yeah...
    Mark
    LeMans Blue Z06
    ​
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 04-01-2013, 11:59 AM #52
    mr4teth
    mr4teth is offline
    Stocker Chevrolet Subaru mr4teth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    State College PA
    Posts
    2,326
    Great concept! Love the power plant but good God that chin spoiler and rear end just screams "RICE"

    I hope it looks better in person!
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by mr4teth; 04-01-2013 at 12:06 PM.
    2007 GT500 with a few go fast parts
    PICS & Dyno

    Quote Originally Posted by SonofaBish View Post
    ...... GT500 is the most over-rated car ever made
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 04-01-2013, 12:28 PM #53
    speedracer
    speedracer is offline
    adult daycare speedracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Somerset Co.
    Posts
    2,907
    Lmao... I agree on power and handiling. The 5.0 bosses were almost as hideous... a 2013 would be the only one I would be seen in public in.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. Back for some more...
    By Wolfpack Speed in forum Wolfpack Speed
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-04-2013, 12:12 PM
  2. Im back!
    By 89 vert in forum Fox-SN95
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-13-2013, 03:18 PM
  3. back to back fox versus 94-95 TB dyno results inside...
    By Killercanary in forum Fox-SN95
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 06-18-2008, 09:27 PM
  4. hello Im back
    By kjracer_22 in forum Welcome New Members
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-30-2006, 06:48 PM
  5. We are back!!!!
    By Sonic03snake in forum The Bar
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 08-24-2006, 12:01 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules