Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 116

Thread: Hellcat

  1. #21
    Member travj31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Uniontown
    Posts
    1,688
    as i stated in my initial post... fatcat or not, very impressive IMO





  2. #22
    No Traction due to Paxton PaxtonShelby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Moon Township
    Posts
    11,377
    Have to admit that's pretty impressive.
    2014 GT Premium - Sterling Gray Metallic - MT82 - Track Pack - Glass Roof - Recaro seats - Spoiler delete
    12.76 @ 114.04 bone stock. Koni yellow coil-overs, BMR watts, LCA and LCA relo brackets, Borla S-type axle back.

    1966 Coupe - 331 stroker - Bullet custom roller cam - cam and motor installed and dyno tuned by Rodeheavers Hot Rod - Astro A5 - McLeod RXT - 486 to the wheels - more fun than my little tires can handle

    1966 Oldsmobile Toronado - currently NOT on jackstands

  3. #23
    Not Bad for 367 SAE RWHP Pure Stock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,499
    2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :

    BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18

  4. #24
    Dead Sea Racing Crew phillysrt4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,316
    Quote Originally Posted by speedracer View Post
    4,439 lbs ... Brilliant
    Yep, which is why even with 707 horse the best they could get out of it on street tires was an 11.2 at 125.

  5. #25
    Dead Sea Racing Crew phillysrt4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,316
    Quote Originally Posted by Cam99 View Post
    end thread :)
    lost the cat :(

  6. #26
    Dead Sea Racing Crew phillysrt4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,316
    Quote Originally Posted by John4cam View Post
    Agreed. Car and driver will muster a 16.30 on street tires.
    Car and Ricer wont even get it down the track because they'll be too busy complaining how much the interior sucks compared to Honda, Toyota, VW, insert-import-of-your-choice-here.

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Polar Vortex
    Posts
    6,031
    Quote Originally Posted by phillysrt4 View Post
    Car and Ricer wont even get it down the track because they'll be too busy complaining how much the interior sucks compared to Honda, Toyota, VW, insert-import-of-your-choice-here.
    Seems it always ends up being real world times...unless even smith drives for them.

  8. #28
    Senior Member scott5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    10,168
    Quote Originally Posted by phillysrt4 View Post
    Yep, which is why even with 707 horse the best they could get out of it on street tires was an 11.2 at 125.
    And I can't wait for someone like jolbert to buy one and gut it down to 3500 and go low 9s with stock everything else. You have to give it props especially when the gt500 weighs 800 lbs less and only 40hp less but best it did was 11.6s at 126/127.. intake/exhaust/tune and tire I bet this thing goes 9s.

    And yes I am eating my words saying it was gna be slow considering its weight and the performance of the 6.4 srt8.. SRT engineers stated the other day that by 2016 they will have a stock production car go 9s off showroom floor.

  9. #29
    No Traction due to Paxton PaxtonShelby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Moon Township
    Posts
    11,377
    Wow - I remember when a new stock GNX was king... Makes you wonder just how far our current muscle car era will go...
    2014 GT Premium - Sterling Gray Metallic - MT82 - Track Pack - Glass Roof - Recaro seats - Spoiler delete
    12.76 @ 114.04 bone stock. Koni yellow coil-overs, BMR watts, LCA and LCA relo brackets, Borla S-type axle back.

    1966 Coupe - 331 stroker - Bullet custom roller cam - cam and motor installed and dyno tuned by Rodeheavers Hot Rod - Astro A5 - McLeod RXT - 486 to the wheels - more fun than my little tires can handle

    1966 Oldsmobile Toronado - currently NOT on jackstands

  10. #30
    Not Bad for 367 SAE RWHP Pure Stock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,499
    Quote Originally Posted by John4cam View Post
    Seems it always ends up being real world times...unless even smith drives for them.
    Who in the hell is even smith???
    2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :

    BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18

  11. #31
    Dead Sea Racing Crew phillysrt4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,316
    Quote Originally Posted by PaxtonShelby View Post
    Wow - I remember when a new stock GNX was king... Makes you wonder just how far our current muscle car era will go...
    Honestly, with the hype surrounding oil availability and the ever increasing fuel economy requirements (with a relatively big jump happening for the 2017 model year), I honestly think the next 5 years are going to be the last hurrah for musclecars. I think auto makers see this too and want to take advantage of the market while they can. Because of this the auto makers aren't going to hold back and will basically go all-out. After about the the 2020 model year I don't see how they can produce such high horsepower cars while still meeting fleet fuel economy requirements unless they force themselves to make limited numbers and when they're gone, they're gone.

  12. #32
    Lou Glutz Motors scorpio333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    555
    Quote Originally Posted by phillysrt4 View Post
    Honestly, with the hype surrounding oil availability and the ever increasing fuel economy requirements (with a relatively big jump happening for the 2017 model year), I honestly think the next 5 years are going to be the last hurrah for musclecars. I think auto makers see this too and want to take advantage of the market while they can. Because of this the auto makers aren't going to hold back and will basically go all-out. After about the the 2020 model year I don't see how they can produce such high horsepower cars while still meeting fleet fuel economy requirements unless they force themselves to make limited numbers and when they're gone, they're gone.
    Likely true for gasoline powered engines. According to my buddy who works for BMW that ugly little i3 is the fastest BMW to 40MPH, taking his word I know next to nothing about them. Give them (manufacturers in general) a couple yrs to apply that technology to heavier, larger cars. Perhaps by 2020 an electric/electric assist or whatever you want to call it producing 300HP could be equivalent to a 700HP gasoline engine. Only time will tell. At least we got to experience the gas engines before they all went away.
    Live free or die

  13. #33
    Senior Member scott5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    10,168
    New Porsche and McLaren are hybrids and produce close to 1k hp

  14. #34
    Dead Sea Racing Crew phillysrt4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,316
    This is exactly my point. Everyone is trying to cram as much power into their flagship cars as they can before CAFE guidelines make it impossible.

  15. #35
    Hangin' with my toddler. Silverhatch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,483
    Quote Originally Posted by phillysrt4 View Post
    Honestly, with the hype surrounding oil availability and the ever increasing fuel economy requirements (with a relatively big jump happening for the 2017 model year), I honestly think the next 5 years are going to be the last hurrah for musclecars. I think auto makers see this too and want to take advantage of the market while they can. Because of this the auto makers aren't going to hold back and will basically go all-out. After about the the 2020 model year I don't see how they can produce such high horsepower cars while still meeting fleet fuel economy requirements unless they force themselves to make limited numbers and when they're gone, they're gone.
    Change out the dates with 1972 and 1978 and this is what they said years ago.


  16. #36
    Dead Sea Racing Crew phillysrt4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,316
    There's a difference between the 70's and today's issue of meeting targets. From 1974 to 1978 (and beyond) performance actually suffered as auto makers tried to meet both emissions and fuel efficiency standards- something that was never mandated before. In today's fleet, the reverse is happening in that auto makers are trying to push more and more out of the cars.

    Second, we've enjoyed a 20 year hiatus in the CAFE requirements as they remained unchanged from 1991 to 2011. That is now going to increase again. Sure a fleet average can be manipulated but you can only produce so many fiestas and focuses so that your fleet average stays high enough to have a Shelby or a GT. There's more to Ford reintroducing an "svo-esque" model of the mustang for 2015 with a 2.0l ecoboost than nostalgia. They have no choice so that the fuel efficiency for their "large footprint" cars stays within CAFE guidelines so they can keep selling Shelby's and GT's.

    Do you think its any coincidence that the fiesta ST with its 1 liter ecoboost is here?

    They can manipulate the numbers game with their fleets in order to continue to offer musclecars, but I have serious doubts of them being able to meet the 2020 CAFE standard of 36mpg for "large footprint" cars, much less the 2025 standards. I could be wrong, and I seriously hope I am, but I have doubts.
    Last edited by phillysrt4; 07-14-2014 at 09:25 PM.

  17. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Polar Vortex
    Posts
    6,031
    Quote Originally Posted by Pure Stock View Post
    Who in the hell is even smith???
    Oh God.

  18. #38
    Senior Member mustang50lx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,220
    I think direct injection and Turbo's will get plenty of power as well as meeting fuel economy requirements in the future. Direct gasoline injection is basically just getting started. Who know what can be achieved with that technology. We (The USA) always find a way to get to get the job done. How many would have dreamed of 600 plus horsepower wars in 1980? Let alone 600 plus horsepower that gets better gas mileage and is many times cleaner running that your 1980 Malibu. I know growing up in the early 80's I never thought any car would have any HP all. And then EECIV and the Fox body changed all that.

  19. #39
    Hangin' with my toddler. Silverhatch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,483
    Quote Originally Posted by mustang50lx View Post
    How many would have dreamed of 600 plus horsepower wars in 1980? Let alone 600 plus horsepower that gets better gas mileage and is many times cleaner running that your 1980 Malibu. I know growing up in the early 80's I never thought any car would have any HP all. And then EECIV and the Fox body changed all that.
    This was my point.


  20. #40
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brighton Township
    Posts
    1,665
    Pricing leaked.

    $59,900.

    Hell of a car for that money.
    2019 Tesla Model 3 Performance

Similar Threads

  1. Gt350 vs Hellcat vs Z28
    By PaxtonShelby in forum Pictures & Videos
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-22-2014, 02:34 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •