Lethal Performance 2015 Mustang: 10s with a 2.9L Whipple Supercharger!

[burntire]

[Seer]

They have since went 10.3. I'm also told this was not done on their 805rwhp calibration, but on a lesser pump gas friendly calibration.

[burntire]

They have since went 10.3. I'm also told this was not done on their 805rwhp calibration, but on a lesser pump gas friendly calibration.

Yea I saw that video also. Would be an easy 9 second car with an auto.

[Seer]

Yea I saw that video also. Would be an easy 9 second car with an auto.

I think I'll be close to them in hp but the centri is a much more forgiving blower to launch.

[burntire]

I think I'll be close to them in hp but the centri is a much more forgiving blower to launch.

When I get a new one my plan is turbo / auto.

[Seer]

When I get a new one my plan is turbo / auto.

Good luck with that. Tuning is still a mess on these 2015's. Basically none of the speed density parameters are available yet.

[burntire]

Good luck with that. Tuning is still a mess on these 2015's.

Tuning will get sorted out over time.

[Seer]

Tuning will get sorted out over time.

Next few weeks at least with hptuners it should get a whole lot better.

[burntire]

Next few weeks at least with hptuners it should get a whole lot better.

Guys will get it unlocked / figured out. Then I will add the processor code to my PRP.

[John4cam]

Strange how these cars seem to have low torque numbers. Looking at 800+rwhp you would expect EASY 9 second passes, but I wonder if the torque has something to do with that?

[PaxtonShelby]

600+ is still a lot of torque though. That car would be a real hoot to drive.

[John4cam]

600+ is still a lot of torque though. That car would be a real hoot to drive.

Oh no doubt. Just seems like it should be closer to mid 700's give or take.

[RUTHLESS]

Have you guys seen these cars in person?

[Dan B.]

That color gives me wood........

[Stangman701]

I think the "low" torque is because of the high compression the stock motors run. Because it's a twin screw the torque still comes in right off idle, but they can't put much timing into it right away because of the higher compression. I bet the same motor running 9:1 or so would be able to make an extra 100-150 ft/lbs.

[John4cam]

I think the "low" torque is because of the high compression the stock motors run. Because it's a twin screw the torque still comes in right off idle, but they can't put much timing into it right away because of the higher compression. I bet the same motor running 9:1 or so would be able to make an extra 100-150 ft/lbs.

That makes sense.

[PaxtonShelby]

That color gives me wood........

Me too. Except lose that ugly graphic...

Dan - plastidip the 5.0 Ranger that color!