Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 55

Thread: 2015+ 5.0 minor bolt-on results..... anybody local ?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Right Wing Nut Dragger Troll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,822

    Question 2015+ 5.0 minor bolt-on results..... anybody local ?

    I know I can search the www for this info. but just wondering if anybody local has installed some minor stuff (cold air, mail-order tune, axle-backs) on their S550 and if you got a baseline dyno and after. American Muscle is claiming 34RWHP and 47RWTQ with just a JLT intake and Bama tune.

    I was just placing this virtual order for my virtual 2016.

    ammalvern.jpg
    2019 Colorado ZR2


  2. #2
    Senior Member Dan B.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Armagh, PA
    Posts
    4,331
    I just virtually dyno'd my virtual 2015GT.

    DynoPull.jpg
    Quote Originally Posted by John4cam View Post
    Ahh fuque
    1985 Ranger--2WD, basic bolt-ons and tires, 11.92 @ 111mph.

    1986 Ranger--2WD, 5.0/T5/8.8.

  3. #3
    Senior Member blackfive-o's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Leetsdale
    Posts
    421
    Nice how you broke the torque curve at the intersection. You a draftsman?
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan B. View Post
    I just virtually dyno'd my virtual 2015GT.

    DynoPull.jpg
    "Old Man"

  4. #4
    Senior Member Dan B.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Armagh, PA
    Posts
    4,331
    After installing a virtual blower........

    fake.jpg
    Quote Originally Posted by John4cam View Post
    Ahh fuque
    1985 Ranger--2WD, basic bolt-ons and tires, 11.92 @ 111mph.

    1986 Ranger--2WD, 5.0/T5/8.8.

  5. #5
    likes turbos Tom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Rostraver
    Posts
    918
    you might be better at the photoshops than me!
    1987 Fiero GT
    Precision 6466, L67, 4T80e, MS3Pro

  6. #6
    Senior Member Dan B.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Armagh, PA
    Posts
    4,331
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom View Post
    you might be better at the photoshops than me!
    You think I actually made that? Google images baby.........let the virtual world do all the work for you!!
    Quote Originally Posted by John4cam View Post
    Ahh fuque
    1985 Ranger--2WD, basic bolt-ons and tires, 11.92 @ 111mph.

    1986 Ranger--2WD, 5.0/T5/8.8.

  7. #7
    Member Mark Aubele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Trafford, Pa
    Posts
    2,308
    You couldn't pay me to run a Bama tune. Take it to Tim to get tuned. If you need to do it mail order go with AED or even Lund.
    2014 Mustang GT Stock and for sale
    2014 M235i (wife's)
    1964 Ford F-100

  8. #8
    Senior Member 1320goat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    South Hills & Washington
    Posts
    863
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Aubele View Post
    You couldn't pay me to run a Bama tune. Take it to Tim to get tuned. If you need to do it mail order go with AED or even Lund.
    All of this.^

  9. #9
    Right Wing Nut Dragger Troll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,822
    OK... no Bama tunes here.
    Last edited by Troll; 09-04-2015 at 03:40 PM. Reason: BS > technical talk
    2019 Colorado ZR2


  10. #10
    Senior Member no1sirbutler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    fairmont,WV
    Posts
    1,352
    I second Lund and their Ngauge is awesome. The things I have seen them do with it is amazing. They tune Beefcakes car and it's the fastest true 2015 in the nation at the moment
    XXX RWHP
    XXX RWTQ

    But only if I let Kenne scream at ya. LOL

  11. #11
    Member Mark Aubele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Trafford, Pa
    Posts
    2,308
    Not sure if this is dragging this off topic, but has anyone seen any verifiable gains with a CAI on the 11-16s? Still running stock airbox can't seem to get a definitive answer. They pick up on the dyno with the hood open but has anyone picked up MPH?
    2014 Mustang GT Stock and for sale
    2014 M235i (wife's)
    1964 Ford F-100

  12. #12
    No Traction due to Paxton PaxtonShelby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Moon Township
    Posts
    11,377
    I've never heard anything good about CAI's. Seems like the tune is where the gains come from. The factory air box isn't too bad from what I've read.
    2014 GT Premium - Sterling Gray Metallic - MT82 - Track Pack - Glass Roof - Recaro seats - Spoiler delete
    12.76 @ 114.04 bone stock. Koni yellow coil-overs, BMR watts, LCA and LCA relo brackets, Borla S-type axle back.

    1966 Coupe - 331 stroker - Bullet custom roller cam - cam and motor installed and dyno tuned by Rodeheavers Hot Rod - Astro A5 - McLeod RXT - 486 to the wheels - more fun than my little tires can handle

    1966 Oldsmobile Toronado - currently NOT on jackstands

  13. #13
    Member Mark Aubele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Trafford, Pa
    Posts
    2,308
    Yeah, staying NA probably for next year just trying to find some more hp. Going with Boss+TB or Cobra Jet setup.
    2014 Mustang GT Stock and for sale
    2014 M235i (wife's)
    1964 Ford F-100

  14. #14
    Not Bad for 367 SAE RWHP Pure Stock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,499
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Aubele View Post
    Yeah, staying NA probably for next year just trying to find some more hp. Going with Boss+TB or Cobra Jet setup.
    Yeahloh95 on here has the cj set up on a 12. Makes solid power. I believe he was thinking about a boss intake but went the cj route.
    2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :

    BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18

  15. #15
    Member Mark Aubele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Trafford, Pa
    Posts
    2,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Pure Stock View Post
    Yeahloh95 on here has the cj set up on a 12. Makes solid power. I believe he was thinking about a boss intake but went the cj route.
    Thanks Pure Stock.

    Yeahloh, did you run the car with the stock manifold then the CJ? More concerned with the mph gain rather than ET for what I do with the car.
    2014 Mustang GT Stock and for sale
    2014 M235i (wife's)
    1964 Ford F-100

  16. #16
    Not Bad for 367 SAE RWHP Pure Stock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,499
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Aubele View Post
    Thanks Pure Stock.
    10-15 whp over the stock intake with a trade off in some midrange. Extending the operating range roughly 1,000 rpm may make it worth it as far as not needing to shift. I have a graph overlayed with a stock intake manifold vs. A complete cj setup. Not a dead nuts comparison though. It is a GT stock manifold vs a Boss with cj. The GT is ahead of the cj until about 5,600 rpm. After that it's cj.

    From the one vid you posted it looked as though excluding the launch the engine gets down to around 4,000 rpm.
    2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :

    BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18

  17. #17
    Member Mark Aubele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Trafford, Pa
    Posts
    2,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Pure Stock View Post
    10-15 whp over the stock intake with a trade off in some midrange. Extending the operating range roughly 1,000 rpm may make it worth it as far as not needing to shift. I have a graph overlayed with a stock intake manifold vs. A complete cj setup. Not a dead nuts comparison though. It is a GT stock manifold vs a Boss with cj. The GT is ahead of the cj until about 5,600 rpm. After that it's cj.

    From the one vid you posted it looked as though excluding the launch the engine gets down to around 4,000 rpm.
    Yes, and I short shifted a couple times, but the highest I ever shift the car is 6800. At the last hillclimb I was going through the finish at 7600 in 4th (3.31s) on the limiter for a while, wasn't sure if it would pull 5th with a last second shift. I think the car would go faster with a Boss or CJ as much time as I could spend from 5000-7600 or so. CJ is some serious coin over the Boss, most dyno tests I see don't show a significant difference between the two.
    2014 Mustang GT Stock and for sale
    2014 M235i (wife's)
    1964 Ford F-100

  18. #18
    Big member venom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    North Fayette Township, PA
    Posts
    1,344
    I'll be doing Lund tune over the winter on my 15. I had his tune on my 11, and it was quite noticeable. No dyno time, only butt meter.

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
    2015 GTPP

  19. #19
    Kickin it Old School somethingclever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bentleyville
    Posts
    4,625
    http://www.mustangandfords.com/how-t...ick-up-sticks/


    Loss of power on this test with intake and TB.

    Big gains from 5500-7000 with cams.
    -JOHN

    Carburetors and SAE wrenches.................


    Buy Made in the USA - It Matters.

  20. #20
    Dead Sea Racing Crew phillysrt4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,316
    Why the hate on Bama tunes?

    I've seen the review from a few years ago that they weren't happy, but they seem to have gotten their s*** together.

    Is there something in the data logs one should look for that is "bad"?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •