Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Transmission opinions for a 2004 Mach 1 turbo

  1. #1
    it's soo-tack sutyak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Fairmont, WV
    Posts
    2,467

    Transmission opinions for a 2004 Mach 1 turbo

    I'd like some opinions regarding my next transmission for the Mach 1. The issue is the guy who owned it before me built the motor, rear end, added a big single turbo, but did nothing for the stock TR3650 except a stronger clutch. If I want any track time at all with this car I have to upgrade this transmission! Ultimately I don't know what I want to do with the car, but it will have at least 650 ft-lb torque to the the wheels. Here are the options as I see them. I'm looking for pros/cons of each.

    Modified TR3650
    Pros: All wiring etc. already there. Weight. Can be built to hold 1000whp.
    Cons: Rare. Close to the cost of a T-56.

    T-56 (Magnum?)
    Pros: Strength
    Cons: Cost. Availability. Need new driveshaft. Any wiring changes?

    Automatic (modified 4R70W?)
    Pros: Strength, longevity, and consistency. Faster 1/4 mile?
    Cons: Cost. Complexity of installation. Auto vs. manual valvebody?

    For the valvebody, does a manual mean full time manual shifting? Does this also mean I wouldn't need an ECU at all to control the shifting? If I wanted it to shift automatically, I would need a whole new ECU, correct? Then I would need to modify the tune to control the shifting?

    I have the opportunity to buy a modified TR3650 for $500, but it sounds like it might need a syncro. It's supposedly built for 700 ft-lb of torque. That seems like a good deal if it doesn't cost much to fix it.

    All opinions welcome. Ultimately what I want is a reliably strong transmission that I can take to the track and beat on, and not hate driving on the street the rest of the time.
    mark
    '04 Mach 1. Built. Turbo. 667whp/631wtq
    '06 Focus. Built. Turbo. WMI. 12.43 @ 115 (sold)
    '03 Mach 1 : 12.61 @ 106.59 (sold)
    he's into that, that spiritual stuff. <><

  2. #2
    Member Mark Aubele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Trafford, Pa
    Posts
    2,308
    I would spend the money once and just get a T56, mostly because of a usable 1st and 5th gear and it is a proven box (and easy to sell should you ever choose to go auto). The car will be faster with an auto, but you may have an issue facing your family and friends afterwards. :)
    2014 Mustang GT Stock and for sale
    2014 M235i (wife's)
    1964 Ford F-100

  3. #3
    it's soo-tack sutyak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Fairmont, WV
    Posts
    2,467
    Something else I just considered with something other than a TR3650 is having to rework the exhaust pipes to the turbo. Already there is a crossover pipe that basically touches the transmission.
    mark
    '04 Mach 1. Built. Turbo. 667whp/631wtq
    '06 Focus. Built. Turbo. WMI. 12.43 @ 115 (sold)
    '03 Mach 1 : 12.61 @ 106.59 (sold)
    he's into that, that spiritual stuff. <><

  4. #4
    25 in the 1/4 SlowSix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Greensburg
    Posts
    1,309
    Pics of the crossover ?
    Is it a custom kit ?

    I'd go t56 personally. Auto vs manual is up to personal preference really. Auto will be faster on the drag strip with a car that makes that kind of power.


    Just a little 500 whp V6

  5. #5
    13 SECOND FRANK turbo83coupe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Greensburg
    Posts
    843
    Maybe if u get the one for $500, send it over to Wick if he is still messing with them. I know he has fixed several for me and some others. Does good work. I just saw him post in the carb rebuild thread...
    -Frank-
    1983 TurboCoupe-- T3, 3" exhaust, front mount, 8.8, LA3, cam -- 13.44@98mph
    1973 F250 highboy-- 300/np435/np205 60f/60r 38's
    1986 GT-- HCI
    2011 WRX
    1999 B2500 7.5/9 drop

  6. #6
    Banned George C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,490
    Th400 and call it a day


    Turbo and t56 makes as much sense as obama in office

  7. #7
    it's soo-tack sutyak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Fairmont, WV
    Posts
    2,467
    Quote Originally Posted by SlowSix View Post
    Pics of the crossover ?
    Is it a custom kit ?

    I'd go t56 personally. Auto vs manual is up to personal preference really. Auto will be faster on the drag strip with a car that makes that kind of power.
    It's a Hellion single turbo kit. If I would have made the setup it would use forward-facing manifolds like George's truck. For now I'll stick with the current turbo setup.

    Here is the driver-to-passenger side crossover where the tubes merge for the single turbo.



    mark
    '04 Mach 1. Built. Turbo. 667whp/631wtq
    '06 Focus. Built. Turbo. WMI. 12.43 @ 115 (sold)
    '03 Mach 1 : 12.61 @ 106.59 (sold)
    he's into that, that spiritual stuff. <><

  8. #8
    it's soo-tack sutyak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Fairmont, WV
    Posts
    2,467
    Quote Originally Posted by George C View Post
    Th400 and call it a day

    Turbo and t56 makes as much sense as obama in office
    Wow, the TH400 is a great price and holds a lot of power. I'd certainly like to have overdrive though! The car will see more street time than track time.
    mark
    '04 Mach 1. Built. Turbo. 667whp/631wtq
    '06 Focus. Built. Turbo. WMI. 12.43 @ 115 (sold)
    '03 Mach 1 : 12.61 @ 106.59 (sold)
    he's into that, that spiritual stuff. <><

  9. #9
    Kickin it Old School somethingclever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bentleyville
    Posts
    4,625
    I would go auto for drag car with small cubes and forced induction and big power.
    -JOHN

    Carburetors and SAE wrenches.................


    Buy Made in the USA - It Matters.

  10. #10
    More RPM !!! Martin0660's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Greensburg, PA
    Posts
    8,058
    Quote Originally Posted by somethingclever View Post
    I would go auto for drag car with small cubes and forced induction and big power.
    who hacked your account?

    lol, I thought they had those 4r70w's pretty lined out some time ago. Seems like a logical choice
    Bob Myers ©

    84 Capri RS Turbo -Best 1/8th - 6.24@109, Best 1/4 - 9.82@136...Still only a 4 banger

  11. #11
    Tripedalist yeahloh95's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Everett, Pa
    Posts
    5,065
    you will break alot less parts with an auto , what rear gear does the car have now ?
    Troy
    95 gt 11.3 @ 126
    68 f100 SB soon to be coyote powered
    12 GT 6m cobra jet powered 11.4 @124
    90 lx supercharged 440 rwhp on 8 lbs
    17 f150 crew cab coyote powered

    PEOPLE HAVE MORE FUN THAN ANYONE

  12. #12
    it's soo-tack sutyak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Fairmont, WV
    Posts
    2,467
    Quote Originally Posted by yeahloh95 View Post
    you will break alot less parts with an auto , what rear gear does the car have now ?
    Stock 3.55 with 31 spline parts.
    mark
    '04 Mach 1. Built. Turbo. 667whp/631wtq
    '06 Focus. Built. Turbo. WMI. 12.43 @ 115 (sold)
    '03 Mach 1 : 12.61 @ 106.59 (sold)
    he's into that, that spiritual stuff. <><

  13. #13
    Kickin it Old School somethingclever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bentleyville
    Posts
    4,625
    Quote Originally Posted by Martin0660 View Post
    who hacked your account?


    LOL...I was thinking as I was typing this...(Bob is gonna think WTF is he talking about?)



    But to help make up Mark's mind, you should share how many rearend's and transmission's you have fragged to get something that works steadily. :)
    -JOHN

    Carburetors and SAE wrenches.................


    Buy Made in the USA - It Matters.

  14. #14
    SCS Addict Stangman701's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Robinson Twp.
    Posts
    2,143
    Wow, if that built TR3650 really only needs a syncro I'd say that would be the way to go. Outside of that a T56 Magnum would get my vote. That's what I have in my cobra and it is awesome. It's almost worth the extra cash just for the better shifting over a regular T56. I wouldn't believe it if I'd never driven one, but it really is way better than a regular T56. Only down side is the shifter selection kinda sucks as it's a different bolt pattern on the tranny than the standard T56. I don't think you'd ever have to worry about the tranny after that until you got into four digit power levels and maybe not even then.
    2015 Charger Hellcat
    2.4" upper pulley, ID1300 injectors, BAP, E85 tune, Cat Delete Pipes, One Piece Drive Shaft, Diff Brace, 305/35/20 555R's for the street and 305/45/18 MT ET Street R's for the track. 9.97@142 Best ET

    85 GT
    Heads and Cam plus other bolt ons

    73 F250
    Lifted, 35's, 460 4spd

    Real name = Ray


  15. #15
    Banned George C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,490
    355 gears and 28s with th400 cruise around 2800 at 65 mph

  16. #16
    it's soo-tack sutyak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Fairmont, WV
    Posts
    2,467
    Quote Originally Posted by George C View Post
    355 gears and 28s with th400 cruise around 2800 at 65 mph
    Not too bad. I run 315/35-17 on the street, so just under a 26" tire. 75mph is the new 65mph, too.

    I'm leaning towards picking up that TR3650 and rebuilding it myself. If nothing else once I fix it I should easily get out of it what I put into it. I have absolutely no timeline I need to stick to, so I have time to change my mind. Rebuilding the TR3650 will be a nice winter project.
    mark
    '04 Mach 1. Built. Turbo. 667whp/631wtq
    '06 Focus. Built. Turbo. WMI. 12.43 @ 115 (sold)
    '03 Mach 1 : 12.61 @ 106.59 (sold)
    he's into that, that spiritual stuff. <><

  17. #17
    likes turbos Tom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Rostraver
    Posts
    918
    th400 for sure
    1987 Fiero GT
    Precision 6466, L67, 4T80e, MS3Pro

  18. #18
    it's soo-tack sutyak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Fairmont, WV
    Posts
    2,467
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom View Post
    th400 for sure
    TH400 looks like would be the cheapest/strongest route as far as an automatic goes, as long as the modifications required for speedometer and driveshaft are straightforward. I'm not sure what I think about cruising at 75mph at 3500 RPM. Can someone with a 3-speed chime in on how annoying it is to drive on the interstate with?
    mark
    '04 Mach 1. Built. Turbo. 667whp/631wtq
    '06 Focus. Built. Turbo. WMI. 12.43 @ 115 (sold)
    '03 Mach 1 : 12.61 @ 106.59 (sold)
    he's into that, that spiritual stuff. <><

  19. #19
    Senior Member Dan B.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Armagh, PA
    Posts
    4,331
    The Ranger has 3.55's, 28" rears and a three speed (C4). I've driven it some on the interstate. It's not that bad but depends on your exhaust and sensitivity to drone. I just love driving it so nothing bothers me.
    Quote Originally Posted by John4cam View Post
    Ahh fuque
    1985 Ranger--2WD, basic bolt-ons and tires, 11.92 @ 111mph.

    1986 Ranger--2WD, 5.0/T5/8.8.

  20. #20
    Kickin it Old School somethingclever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bentleyville
    Posts
    4,625
    no way would I have a modern street car with a trans that didn't have OD.

    There are so many good options out there for electronic lockup convertors and OD transmissions that putting in a 3-speed just wouldn't make sense IMO.

    Stronger and cheaper yes - but is it the right choice for the application?
    -JOHN

    Carburetors and SAE wrenches.................


    Buy Made in the USA - It Matters.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •