Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: 87-93 lower intake versus SN95 lower intake

  1. #1
    Senior Member 95DropTop's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Gibsonia, PA
    Posts
    323

    87-93 lower intake versus SN95 lower intake

    Hello.

    I have a 1995 GT convertible. The car is stock.

    I was looking at buying a ported stock lower intake but it was ported from an older intake core from a 1988, I think.
    I was told that such a ported lower intake can add 10HP.

    Does anyone know if this older lower will work on my 1995 with the stock upper? I am concerned about the fit and clearance. My hood room is limited on this car.

    Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    Senior Member coralcoupe1993's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Robinson
    Posts
    3,842
    Quote Originally Posted by 95DropTop View Post
    Hello.

    I have a 1995 GT convertible. The car is stock.

    I was looking at buying a ported stock lower intake but it was ported from an older intake core from a 1988, I think.
    I was told that such a ported lower intake can add 10HP.

    Does anyone know if this older lower will work on my 1995 with the stock upper? I am concerned about the fit and clearance. My hood room is limited on this car.

    Thanks in advance.

    As you may know, I am brand new to SN-95s. I belive that the Fox intake is higher and just wont fit under the tower brace.
    87 GT
    93 Notch
    60 Country Sedan
    Fairlanes/Galaxies 59-68
    67 Contiental 4 door
    06 Powerstroke

  3. #3
    Senior Member 95DropTop's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Gibsonia, PA
    Posts
    323
    Thanks. Yes, I heard that the fox's were taller but I was hoping that the lower was the same height but the upper would be the one that would be taller.

  4. #4
    Senior Member coralcoupe1993's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Robinson
    Posts
    3,842
    Quote Originally Posted by 95DropTop View Post
    Thanks. Yes, I heard that the fox's were taller but I was hoping that the lower was the same height but the upper would be the one that would be taller.

    I think its both???
    87 GT
    93 Notch
    60 Country Sedan
    Fairlanes/Galaxies 59-68
    67 Contiental 4 door
    06 Powerstroke

  5. #5
    Senior Member Killercanary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Altoona, PA
    Posts
    2,338
    I'm 90% sure that the base is the same in terms of height. It will have an extra hole for the IAC sensor as the fox's had them in the lower intake where we have them in the intake tube between the MAF and the TB.

    I would suggest NOT getting it though. I've been around mustangs for >10 yrs now and I can tell you that everyone I've ever known that ever bought ported stock parts replaced them with a better aftermarket alternative in the end. If your looking for a great bang for your buck intake, an edelbrock performer will work great with the stock heads and cam and it will still grow with you if and when you change them. The edelbrock performer will fit under the stock hood, even with the underhood blanket still in place. The upper intake on the 94-95's is the real restriction.
    -Paul

    1995 GT 'vert
    Best times on old 302 combo:
    12.03 at 112.5mph NA
    Best time with 9:1 compression NA dart block 331 setup:
    11.50 at 121mph
    Dyno'd: 415rwhp/410rwtq


    2004 Z16 commemorative edition Z06
    100% stock: 11.9 at 118mph




  6. #6
    Senior Member 95DropTop's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Gibsonia, PA
    Posts
    323
    Thanks for the info and, yes, you are right. I would likely throw away the money + the gaskets + the labor only to do it better with an aftermarket intake setup. I was just chasing the ported lower to avoid any clearance problems. I have seen so many discussions that say that this or that "won't fit unless you trim the hood bracing" (whatever that means) or "you will need a new strut-tower brace" (which I can believe for sure).

    Do you think that the TrickFlow Street Heat will also work or is Edelbrock the way to go - period?

    It would be nice to know what my options are so that I can search for some used ones and such or watch for good deals on new ones.

    Any information or resources that you have is most appreciated.

    Thanks.

  7. #7
    Not Bad for 367 SAE RWHP Pure Stock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,499
    I have a Fox Lake ported Track Heat that will set you straight.

    http://www.steelcitystangs.com/forum...read.php?t=958
    2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :

    BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18

  8. #8
    Senior Member 95DropTop's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Gibsonia, PA
    Posts
    323
    I am sure that it is worth the money but I cannot swing that one.

    Thanks though.

    Vince.

Similar Threads

  1. Lower intake porting
    By J-rod in forum Fox-SN95
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-15-2014, 09:51 PM
  2. PI Lower Intake for 4.6 SOHC
    By Stroked03Cobra in forum Ford Vehicles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-19-2010, 10:46 PM
  3. WTB: 99-04 GT lower intake
    By Rio94gt in forum Ford Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-25-2008, 12:09 AM
  4. What are these holes on lower intake??
    By White5.0 in forum Fox-SN95
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-06-2008, 04:29 AM
  5. FS: 5.0L gt-40 intake ported lower
    By dappie99 in forum Ford Vehicles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-04-2008, 08:54 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •