Their defense looks better than the offense as a whole.
Their defense looks better than the offense as a whole.
2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :
BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
quite an ass kicking.
beer, cased dogs, sirloin burgers....the party continues!!!
Wolfpack Speed, Inc.4290 Campbells Run RdPittsburgh, PA 15205(412) 279-4902
O-line for Steelers didn't impress me much, especially in the first half. Ben looked to be under far more pressure than i think he should have been. Defense looked pretty damn good. Course after watching the Chicago/San Diego game either of those teams probably would hold the Steelers scoreless.
Ed...
2012 Ram 2500 4x4, 5.7 Hemi, leveled, 35" tires
2004 Mustang GT - Comp Orange/5speed Best 1/4 11.94@113.64, 1/8 7.59@89.48, 1.57 60' - Best 60' 1.51, just a NA 2v
Originally Posted by Ares
agreed
They would have looked better if the receivers could actually catch the ball. They were dropping passes left and right. I still think the NFL need separate stats for dropped balls that bounced off of the receivers' chests. Alot of those incompletes weren't Bens fault.
All around a good game to start the season off. Cant get to excited after beating the Browns but its def better than if we lost.
O-line is something that needs attention, as well as wr's dropping balls. Wouldnt mind alittle bit more of Davenport and alittle bit less of Parker up the middle too. But you cant become predictable either. They need to spell Parker one or two series a game with Davenport. Still only week one and they are things that are fixable. Of course they dont give a rats ass what we all think anyways!
Cant complain much when you beat a divisional opponent handily though!
x 3564574843930383030895
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks