Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Not bad for unported iron gt-40's and a cobra intake

  1. 12-10-2007, 11:18 PM #1
    Pure Stock
    Pure Stock is offline
    Not Bad for 367 SAE RWHP Pure Stock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,499

    Not bad for unported iron gt-40's and a cobra intake

    *N/A 310 c.i.d.
    *manual trans.
    *10.8xx's@122.xx
    Attached Images Attached Images
    2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :

    BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 12-11-2007, 12:10 AM #2
    yeahloh95
    yeahloh95 is offline
    Tripedalist yeahloh95's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Everett, Pa
    Posts
    5,065
    i like that car alot
    Troy
    95 gt 11.3 @ 126
    68 f100 SB soon to be coyote powered
    12 GT 6m cobra jet powered 11.4 @124
    90 lx supercharged 440 rwhp on 8 lbs
    17 f150 crew cab coyote powered

    PEOPLE HAVE MORE FUN THAN ANYONE
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 12-11-2007, 12:13 AM #3
    White5.0
    White5.0 is offline
    Senior Member White5.0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    State College, PA
    Posts
    3,552
    wow thats impressive
    2013 Mustang GT
    1987 Mustang GT
    1999 Contour SVT
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 12-11-2007, 12:41 AM #4
    somethingclever
    somethingclever is offline
    Kickin it Old School somethingclever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bentleyville
    Posts
    4,625
    Actually...that is bad if it weighs 1000lbs.....


    Any idea on race wt?
    -JOHN

    Carburetors and SAE wrenches.................


    Buy Made in the USA - It Matters.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 12-11-2007, 12:46 AM #5
    Pure Stock
    Pure Stock is offline
    Not Bad for 367 SAE RWHP Pure Stock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,499
    Quote Originally Posted by somethingclever View Post
    Actually...that is bad if it weighs 1000lbs.....


    Any idea on race wt?
    2,980 lbs. with driver.
    2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :

    BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 12-11-2007, 01:05 AM #6
    somethingclever
    somethingclever is offline
    Kickin it Old School somethingclever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bentleyville
    Posts
    4,625
    Sick....

    I wonder how much ET can be had with less wheels up action??
    -JOHN

    Carburetors and SAE wrenches.................


    Buy Made in the USA - It Matters.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 12-11-2007, 01:14 AM #7
    Pure Stock
    Pure Stock is offline
    Not Bad for 367 SAE RWHP Pure Stock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,499
    Quote Originally Posted by somethingclever View Post
    Sick....

    I wonder how much ET can be had with less wheels up action??
    Looking at the ideal e.t. formula with the mph the combo generates. That particular set-up can achieve .334 under ideal. That my friend is an efficient race car. For comparsion sakes, my current combo has been under ideal right in the .2 range. With a switch of trans. and clutch types in the future I hope to shave at least one more tenth off the ideal. Just think $6,000 for a tenth. Crazy.
    2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :

    BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 12-11-2007, 01:43 AM #8
    somethingclever
    somethingclever is offline
    Kickin it Old School somethingclever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bentleyville
    Posts
    4,625
    Quote Originally Posted by Pure Stock View Post
    Looking at the ideal e.t. formula with the mph the combo generates.....

    Come on Joe....you threw your calculator away....no? :D


    Don't try it on your scientific calculator cause it don't work, take it to the tarmac and discover the solution.


    Don't you think that a launch with less chassis movement would yield a better 60' time???
    -JOHN

    Carburetors and SAE wrenches.................


    Buy Made in the USA - It Matters.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 12-11-2007, 09:37 AM #9
    Killercanary
    Killercanary is offline
    Senior Member Killercanary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Altoona, PA
    Posts
    2,338
    Evan has been campaigning that car for a long, long time. Those look like fairly recent pics though. Impressive is an understatement for that car and what it is and Evan can drive the hell out of it!
    -Paul

    1995 GT 'vert
    Best times on old 302 combo:
    12.03 at 112.5mph NA
    Best time with 9:1 compression NA dart block 331 setup:
    11.50 at 121mph
    Dyno'd: 415rwhp/410rwtq

    2004 Z16 commemorative edition Z06
    100% stock: 11.9 at 118mph


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 12-11-2007, 11:31 AM #10
    04yellowcobra
    04yellowcobra is offline
    Yellow is faster!
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    York PA
    Posts
    273
    What class Joe? Looks like super stock? And if it only goes 10.80s for super stock thats not fast enough!
    Jason



    Just a little stock coyote that runs low 10s!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 12-11-2007, 11:40 AM #11
    04yellowcobra
    04yellowcobra is offline
    Yellow is faster!
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    York PA
    Posts
    273
    edit: I just saw they are un-ported ... nevermind!! Thats not superstock and thats flyinG!!!
    Jason



    Just a little stock coyote that runs low 10s!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 12-11-2007, 11:55 AM #12
    Pure Stock
    Pure Stock is offline
    Not Bad for 367 SAE RWHP Pure Stock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,499
    Quote Originally Posted by somethingclever View Post
    Don't you think that a launch with less chassis movement would yield a better 60' time???
    Then it would look like poop.
    2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :

    BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 12-11-2007, 11:57 AM #13
    Pure Stock
    Pure Stock is offline
    Not Bad for 367 SAE RWHP Pure Stock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,499
    Quote Originally Posted by 04yellowcobra View Post
    What class Joe? Looks like super stock? And if it only goes 10.80s for super stock thats not fast enough!
    D/FI...Stock Eliminator
    2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :

    BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 12-11-2007, 06:55 PM #14
    INSANELY CRAZY
    INSANELY CRAZY is offline
    far from a newb!!! INSANELY CRAZY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    out in the woods
    Posts
    4,948
    thats sweet....
    ridin fast,hittin da hills,throwin some dirt

    2003 polaris predator 500

    (wanna ride,just pm me!!!)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 12-11-2007, 07:15 PM #15
    Silverhatch
    Silverhatch is offline
    Hangin' with my toddler. Silverhatch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,483
    Look how it plants the tires in the third pic!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 12-11-2007, 08:33 PM #16
    somethingclever
    somethingclever is offline
    Kickin it Old School somethingclever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bentleyville
    Posts
    4,625
    Quote Originally Posted by Pure Stock View Post
    Then it would look like poop.
    -JOHN

    Carburetors and SAE wrenches.................


    Buy Made in the USA - It Matters.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. F/S: FRESH World Products Windsor JR. Cast Iron heads 180cc Intake #5303
    By thebreeze72 in forum Ford Vehicles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-08-2014, 12:56 AM
  2. 03 cobra fuel pressure sensor bad?
    By map22 in forum SN95-New Edge
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-15-2011, 04:38 PM
  3. Bad Balancer? I assume this is bad. What makes a good balancer? Buy new or used?
    By DRRummel in forum General Tech
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-19-2009, 12:59 AM
  4. Bad boys + Bad girls at prp
    By 2001GTTT in forum Meets & Events
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-25-2008, 02:02 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules