Any of you guys give me an idea of what a 4 cylinder NON TURBO stang would get for gas mileage?
Any of you guys give me an idea of what a 4 cylinder NON TURBO stang would get for gas mileage?
31-33 highway/22-24 city depending on state of tune/driving style ect.
2005 Mustang GT
11.2 @ 123
I had a 91 notch 4cyl duel plug motor and got 25mpg, swaped it to a 86 4cyl turbo and get 30 mpg when drivin normal.
waybetter than a toyota takoma
Troy
95 gt 11.3 @ 126
68 f100 SB soon to be coyote powered
12 GT 6m cobra jet powered 11.4 @124
90 lx supercharged 440 rwhp on 8 lbs
17 f150 crew cab coyote powered
PEOPLE HAVE MORE FUN THAN ANYONE
Theres your problem right there :D Maybe its my problem, I got to keep the right pedal on the floor :D Never had a NA 2.3, but got 25-28 with my pig heavy TC, and pretty much 25 with my Capri (both turbo). Its kinda like a V6 in a truck versus a V8. In a lot of cases the V8 gets the same / better milage because it isnt WOT to keep up at highway speeds.
Bob Myers
I had both worlds with my ranger, It was a 88Hp wonder it got around 25 MPG on the road with the converter locked up headed west! I did the 2.3 turbo swap with the IHI & A4LD it would get 28/29 on the Carlisle trip, Locked up 1800 RPM 8/10 Lb boost..
289 slabside cobra![]()
6S1941![]()
40 Ford Sedan Delivery < For Sale
The mileage difference between the v8 and 4 banger in the same car are very small...the aerodynamics of the car plays more of a role (like 95%+) than the engine size. The other factors being tire width and a slightly less efficient v8...assuming the same gearing of course.
My buddy with a manual v8 lx got 26mpg with 3.55's highway @ 70mph.
My old 2000 GT mustang got 30mpg once and avg'd 27-28 on PA turnpike. The v6 counterparts typically saw 1-2 mpg better...due to narrower tires and a very slightly more efficient engine.
-JOHN
Carburetors and SAE wrenches.................
Buy Made in the USA - It Matters.
I had one (91LX) and got in the mid-low 20's with it, it too was a dual plug setup. It was slow and didn't get very good mileage, I wouldn't look to one as a DD to save on fuel as there are better alternatives out there.
-Paul
1995 GT 'vert
Best times on old 302 combo:
12.03 at 112.5mph NA
Best time with 9:1 compression NA dart block 331 setup:
11.50 at 121mph
Dyno'd: 415rwhp/410rwtq
2004 Z16 commemorative edition Z06
100% stock: 11.9 at 118mph
you are better off findin a v8 fox close to stock and drivin it daily had a 91 4cyl auto vert and it was terrible on gas for a 4cyl the best was usually 22mpg that was highway at that.
i got a different car. The one I found though was a 92 hatch with black interior for 1200.00. Instead I got a 94 Buick Regal. Ive heard they do pretty good in the snow.
Another factor is that 88 H.P. 2.3 is struggling to motivate the 3,000+ lbs. vehicle, where the 5.0L ain't breaking a sweat.
2011 Mustang GT, MT-82, 3.73's :
BONE STOCK 12.223@115.18
Wonder what the difference between the 88hp 2.3 and the 105hp 2.3 is in gas mileage? My post was referring to the 105hp version. Like I said, it's always done awesome.
2005 Mustang GT
11.2 @ 123
Bookmarks