I started building a 302 for our 88 GT now I came across this 351c ,not to far on the 302,now I'm not sure which one to go with????? any thoughts
I started building a 302 for our 88 GT now I came across this 351c ,not to far on the 302,now I'm not sure which one to go with????? any thoughts
clevelands are easier power, BUT the parts are pricey..
2015 A6 Mustang GT that so far has gone 9.48@147 but still the fastest prochargerd S550 in the world aside from Tim Essick's!
www.Rodeheavershotrod.com
302 cheaper to build, 351c would be different in a fox and cool. I thought of doing a 351C for my 84. Parts for sure are not cheap.
Ed...
2012 Ram 2500 4x4, 5.7 Hemi, leveled, 35" tires
2004 Mustang GT - Comp Orange/5speed Best 1/4 11.94@113.64, 1/8 7.59@89.48, 1.57 60' - Best 60' 1.51, just a NA 2v
I believe Holcomb's has a kit for a 351C swap into a Fox. The question is how many parts do you have for the 302 and how much do you want to spent for the parts to use the Cleveland. Edelbrock recently came out with C heads/intakes.
I'd personally stay with the 302 based motor unless you know the Cleveland well.
-J
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks