Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: Fuel pressure question - NA EFI 347

  1. #21
    GOT RUMBLE??? Balaska347's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Belle Vernon
    Posts
    1,294
    Exactly a NA car won't hurt itself from being to lean it just won't make power. A power adder car will keep making more hp as you lean it out until it blows itself up thats why the wideband will help them. For a NA car it is pretty much a waste unless you enjoy watching the gauge. It's all driver preference.


    '89 Mustang GT
    '04.5 Duramax

    Jones Race Car Trailers
    www.jonesrv.com

  2. #22
    Dead Sea Racing Crew phillysrt4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,316
    Quote Originally Posted by Balaska347 View Post
    Exactly a NA car won't hurt itself from being to lean it just won't make power. A power adder car will keep making more hp as you lean it out until it blows itself up thats why the wideband will help them.
    ???

    huh?

  3. #23
    GOT RUMBLE??? Balaska347's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Belle Vernon
    Posts
    1,294
    Quote Originally Posted by 349Stroker View Post
    I can't see how it is a waste.Still have to tune a N/A car and my pms and wideband did great on my 349

    That made 435 rwhp at 12.2 a/f

    The guy I sold it to dynoed it and got those #'s but hasn't been back to thre dyno since to lean it out.I never dynoed the car I just tuned it with pms and a wideband
    The reason I say its a waste is because I bet I could have made the same 435 maybe only 430 without the $900 PMS and a $300 wideband with the car on a dyno with a a/f reading. So I could have saved $1100.

    Philly what are you confused about?


    '89 Mustang GT
    '04.5 Duramax

    Jones Race Car Trailers
    www.jonesrv.com

  4. #24
    Dead Sea Racing Crew phillysrt4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,316
    Quote Originally Posted by Balaska347 View Post
    Philly what are you confused about?
    if a cylinder is lean, it runs hotter. If it runs hotter, its more susceptible to detonation/knocking. If there is sufficient knocking, you can damage your engine.

    I just never saw any evidence that NA engines are "immune" to this, or that this only applies to FI cars.

  5. #25
    GOT RUMBLE??? Balaska347's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Belle Vernon
    Posts
    1,294
    Quote Originally Posted by phillysrt4 View Post
    if a cylinder is lean, it runs hotter. If it runs hotter, its more susceptible to detonation/knocking. If there is sufficient knocking, you can damage your engine.

    I just never saw any evidence that NA engines are "immune" to this, or that this only applies to FI cars.

    You're right NA cars aren't immune to hurting themselves but it take a lot more to hurt a NA car. What I was trying to say is that the NA car will lay over first and you will know to add fuel. A power adder car will keep making power until it will usually push out a head gasket or break a piston. Widebands are a nice tool to have but if it was me I would go the other route.


    '89 Mustang GT
    '04.5 Duramax

    Jones Race Car Trailers
    www.jonesrv.com

  6. #26
    Dead Sea Racing Crew phillysrt4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,316
    Quote Originally Posted by Balaska347 View Post
    You're right NA cars aren't immune to hurting themselves but it take a lot more to hurt a NA car. What I was trying to say is that the NA car will lay over first and you will know to add fuel. A power adder car will keep making power until it will usually push out a head gasket or break a piston. Widebands are a nice tool to have but if it was me I would go the other route.
    ahhhhh ok i see what you mean now.

    sorry for the confusion.

  7. #27
    Pinks All Out #189 349Stroker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Petersburg,PA. 16669
    Posts
    816
    Quote Originally Posted by Balaska347 View Post
    The reason I say its a waste is because I bet I could have made the same 435 maybe only 430 without the $900 PMS and a $300 wideband with the car on a dyno with a a/f reading. So I could have saved $1100.

    I never new chip tuning on a dyno was free!!!!!

    and every time you chip tune guys change something it is back to the dyno

    Even w/o a chip you still have to go back to the dyno and tune and it ain't free.As for me, I just go out the road and change some numbers
    88 GT...and some boost

  8. #28
    GOT RUMBLE??? Balaska347's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Belle Vernon
    Posts
    1,294
    Quote Originally Posted by 349Stroker View Post
    I never new chip tuning on a dyno was free!!!!!

    and every time you chip tune guys change something it is back to the dyno

    Even w/o a chip you still have to go back to the dyno and tune and it ain't free.As for me, I just go out the road and change some numbers

    I wouldn't go with a chip either the computer shouldn't need to be touched unless you are having driveablilty issues on a NA car. I will tune it through the fuel psi regulator and timing. You want as much timing you can run without knocking and a a/f of 12.8-13.2 NA. The other thing you want to watch for is a relatively flat fuel curve which it should be with a NA car. To do all this for my car I had $60 in dyno time which everyone wants to see what kind of HP their car is making anyway. And if I make a large enough change that I will be worried about the tune I will be putting it back on the dyno anyway to see what kind of HP I gained.

    I called everywhere I could find within 5 hours of here that custom tune through the computer and told them what I have and asked them if they can get me anymore HP they all said probably not or maybe a few. One guy told me oh yeah I see around 30 RWHP all the time so I took my car all the way there and after 6 hours on the dyno he gave me all my money back. If you can get me just 10 more RWHP with you and the PMS I will pay you to tune my car. I just bought a new cam from AFM so I wouldn't mind putting it on the dyno.


    '89 Mustang GT
    '04.5 Duramax

    Jones Race Car Trailers
    www.jonesrv.com

  9. #29
    GOT RUMBLE??? Balaska347's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Belle Vernon
    Posts
    1,294
    Oh yeah there is no right or wrong answer here it is basically preference and how much money you want or have to spend. You also have to have the knowledge to tune on your own which a lot of people don't have.


    '89 Mustang GT
    '04.5 Duramax

    Jones Race Car Trailers
    www.jonesrv.com

  10. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    North Hills of Pittsburgh
    Posts
    430
    Thanks for all of the input everyone. Perhaps I will take it up to Big Shot or another dyno to see where the A/F is at. Oh yeah, and where the power is at as well. If I hit 360/370rwhp, I will be happy and leave it alone.
    2016 GT Premium

Similar Threads

  1. WTB: EFI Fuel Pressure Gauge
    By Dan B. in forum Ford Parts
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-22-2011, 08:37 PM
  2. question on fuel pressure
    By vitaleffects626 in forum General Tech
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-05-2011, 11:04 PM
  3. Crane Adj. fuel pressure regulator for 86-93 EFI fox
    By Pure Stock in forum Ford Vehicles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-05-2008, 02:57 AM
  4. Fuel pressure gauge question
    By scott5 in forum General Tech
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-23-2007, 05:17 PM
  5. N/A EFI 347 c.i.d. (VIDEO) Mid 10's
    By Pure Stock in forum Pictures & Videos
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-23-2007, 07:01 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •